Paper · 2011 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Evaluation of botanicals and biopesticides in the management of bollworm complex in cotton

S. L. Borkar; S. V. Sarode

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Evaluation of botanicals and biopesticides on the management of cotton bollworm was carried out during 2004–05 and 2005–06 at the Department of Entomology, Dr. P D K V, Akola in a randomized block design. In all twenty treatments consisting of NSE 5%, neem oil 1%, azadirachtin 1500 ppm, CASE 5% were evaluated initially against sucking pests and continued further for evaluation against bollworm complex by scheduling the treatments viz., HaNPV 250 LE/ha, Bt 1000 g/ha and spinosad 45 SC @ 0. 01%. A application of NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC as well as NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by HaNPV 250 LE/ha emerged as the most effective treatment schedules in minimizing the green fruiting bodies damage caused due to H. armigera. Similarly, the influence of NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC and NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha performed better against larval population of E. vitella damage in green fruiting damage. The treatment schedules comprising NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC as well as Bt 1000 g/ha found effective in reducing the infestation of pink bollworm in green bolls and loculi damage. The treatments containing NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC, NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha were found effective in recording the lowest open boll and loculi damage as well as minimum bad seed cotton due to bollworm complex at harvest. The treatment, NSE 5% followed by spinosad 45 SC observed as the most effective treatment as it has obtained the highest seed cotton yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC was among the most effective schedules in minimizing green fruiting body damage by H. armigera.

Treatment
NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SCe1
Interactor
H. armigerae1pest
Outcome
green fruiting bodies damagee1
Direction
minimizinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“A application of NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC as well as NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by HaNPV 250 LE/ha emerged as the most effective treatment schedules in minimizing the green fruiting bodies damage caused due to H. armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by HaNPV 250 LE/ha was among the most effective schedules in minimizing green fruiting body damage by H. armigera.

Treatment
NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by HaNPV 250 LE/hae1
Interactor
H. armigerae1pest
Outcome
green fruiting bodies damagee1
Direction
minimizinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“A application of NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC as well as NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by HaNPV 250 LE/ha emerged as the most effective treatment schedules in minimizing the green fruiting bodies damage caused due to H. armigera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC performed better against larval population of E. vitella in green fruiting bodies.

Treatment
NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SCe2
Interactor
E. vitellae2pest
Outcome
larval population of E. vitellae2
Direction
performed bettere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“the influence of NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC and NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha performed better against larval population of E. vitella damage in green fruiting damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha performed better against larval population of E. vitella in green fruiting bodies.

Treatment
NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/hae2
Interactor
E. vitellae2pest
Outcome
larval population of E. vitellae2
Direction
performed bettere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e2

“the influence of NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC and NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha performed better against larval population of E. vitella damage in green fruiting damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC was effective in reducing pink bollworm infestation in green bolls.

Treatment
NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SCe3
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae3pest
Outcome
infestation of pink bollworm in green bollse3
Direction
reducinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatment schedules comprising NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC as well as Bt 1000 g/ha found effective in reducing the infestation of pink bollworm in green bolls and loculi damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt 1000 g/ha in the schedule was effective in reducing pink bollworm infestation in green bolls.

Treatment
Bt 1000 g/hae3
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae3pest
Outcome
infestation of pink bollworm in green bollse3
Direction
reducinge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e3

“The treatment schedules comprising NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC as well as Bt 1000 g/ha found effective in reducing the infestation of pink bollworm in green bolls and loculi damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC recorded the lowest open boll and loculi damage at harvest.

Treatment
NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SCe4
Interactor
bollworm complexe4pest
Outcome
open boll and loculi damagee4
Direction
loweste4
Qualifier
at harveste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e4

“The treatments containing NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC, NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha were found effective in recording the lowest open boll and loculi damage as well as minimum bad seed cotton due to bollworm complex at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC recorded the minimum bad seed cotton at harvest.

Treatment
NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SCe4
Interactor
bollworm complexe4pest
Outcome
bad seed cottone4
Direction
minimume4
Qualifier
at harveste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e4

“The treatments containing NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC, NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha were found effective in recording the lowest open boll and loculi damage as well as minimum bad seed cotton due to bollworm complex at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha recorded the lowest open boll and loculi damage at harvest.

Treatment
NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/hae4
Interactor
bollworm complexe4pest
Outcome
open boll and loculi damagee4
Direction
loweste4
Qualifier
at harveste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e4

“The treatments containing NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC, NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha were found effective in recording the lowest open boll and loculi damage as well as minimum bad seed cotton due to bollworm complex at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha recorded the minimum bad seed cotton at harvest.

Treatment
NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/hae4
Interactor
bollworm complexe4pest
Outcome
bad seed cottone4
Direction
minimume4
Qualifier
at harveste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e4

“The treatments containing NSE 5% and azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by spinosad 45 SC, NSE 5% as well as azadirachtin 1500 ppm followed by Bt 1000 g/ha were found effective in recording the lowest open boll and loculi damage as well as minimum bad seed cotton due to bollworm complex at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSE 5% followed by spinosad 45 SC was the most effective treatment and gave the highest seed cotton yield.

Treatment
NSE 5% followed by spinosad 45 SCe5
Outcome
seed cotton yielde5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bollworm complex in cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
e5

“The treatment, NSE 5% followed by spinosad 45 SC observed as the most effective treatment as it has obtained the highest seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1660 · show in text ↑

azadirachtin · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

spinosad · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

azadirachtin · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

spinosad · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

spinosad · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

transgenic · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

transgenic · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.