Paper · 2017 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

IMPACT OF GARLIC EXTRACT IN COMPARISON WITH CHLOROPYRIFOSE INSECTICIDE AGAINST CERTAIN PESTS AND ASSOCIATED PREDATORS IN COTTON FIELDS AT SHARKIA GOVERNORATE, EGYPT

Ibrahim, Mohamed M.A.; Al-Shannaf, H. M.H.; Zaki, A. A.A.; et al.

16
claims
41
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in cotton fields, Gossypium barbadense L. variety Giza 86 at Zagazig District, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt during 2014 season. Four programs were applied with three respective sprays for each using commercial formulation of garlic extract Nat-108 and varied as spray start times and interval periods towards the development of more environmentally sound technologies for management of cotton aphids (Aphis gossyppii), cotton thrips (Thrips tabaci), sweet potato whitefly (Bemesia tabaci), spider mites (Tetranychus spp.), leafhoppers (Empoasca spp.), green stink bug (Nezara viridula), pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) and cotton leafworm (Spodoptera littoralis). In addition to the side effects on several predators species found in cotton fields associated with cotton pests, such as, coccinellids, chrysopids, staphylinids, anthocorid, dipterous and true spiders were studied. Results, educed that the commercial formulation of garlic extract at the rate of 1 litter/100 litter water showed relatively high efficiency against aphids, leafhoppers and thrips, with maximum reduction percentages of 81.33, 82.51 and 84.12%, respectively; moderate efficiency against pink bollworm, whitefly, spider mites, green stink bug with maximum reduction percentages of 61.50, 78.89, 67.56 and 54.46%, respectively and low efficacy against predators except at the end season where the relatively highest reduction percentage was 62.91%, while it was less effective against the cotton leaf worm ranged 23.30-25.80% reduction in comparison with 70.56-90.00% reduction in cotton leafworm population for Dursban (chloropyrifose). So, the garlic extract cannot considered as a botanical pesticide against S. littoralis under cotton field conditions at Sharkia Governorate but needs more studies to evaluate its efficacy on different levels of S. littoralis infestation and stags. In regard to the programs results for garlic extract efficacy, it cleared that the first program tended to be the highest sustainable control of aphids, whitefly, thrips and spider mites on cotton plants, where the sprays started just after cotton plants emergence, whereas the numbers of pests were very low while the third program where the sprays started after 20 days of cotton plants emergence was tended to be the highest sustainable control of leafhoppers. In case of N. viridula, it could be decided that the organophosphorous pesticide, Dursban can be used as effective insecticide especially at the end season period. Finally, garlic extract was tended to be safe to predators especially throughout its effective activity period during the period from seedling to the end of growing season of cotton plants that confirmed by the results of the third program which ranged 2.57-21.46% reduction percentages in predators population. So, garlic extract could be recommended to be used effectively against cotton aphids, leafhoppers, cotton thrips and pink bollworm in IPM program of cotton pests in cotton fields. The organophosphorous compound, Dursban can be considered as good control pesticide against tested pests recorded reduction percentages ranged 56.99-96.99% but caused serious damage to associated predators on cotton plants at the end of season period recorded reduction percentages reached to 99.76% that disturbed the natural balance in cotton cultivation area environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced cotton aphids by up to 81.33%.

Treatment
garlic extract at the rate of 1 litter/100 litter watere0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphidse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
81.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract at the rate of 1 litter/100 litter water showed relatively high efficiency against aphids, leafhoppers and thrips, with maximum reduction percentages of 81.33, 82.51 and 84.12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced leafhoppers by up to 82.51%.

Treatment
garlic extract at the rate of 1 litter/100 litter watere0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
leafhopperse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
82.51e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract at the rate of 1 litter/100 litter water showed relatively high efficiency against aphids, leafhoppers and thrips, with maximum reduction percentages of 81.33, 82.51 and 84.12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced thrips by up to 84.12%.

Treatment
garlic extract at the rate of 1 litter/100 litter watere0
Interactor
thripsThripse0pest
Outcome
thripse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
84.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract at the rate of 1 litter/100 litter water showed relatively high efficiency against aphids, leafhoppers and thrips, with maximum reduction percentages of 81.33, 82.51 and 84.12%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced pink bollworm by up to 61.50%.

Treatment
garlic extractt1
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
pink bollworme0
Direction
reductione0
Value
61.50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate efficiency against pink bollworm, whitefly, spider mites, green stink bug with maximum reduction percentages of 61.50, 78.89, 67.56 and 54.46%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced whitefly by up to 78.89%.

Treatment
garlic extractt1
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
78.89e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate efficiency against pink bollworm, whitefly, spider mites, green stink bug with maximum reduction percentages of 61.50, 78.89, 67.56 and 54.46%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced spider mites by up to 67.56%.

Treatment
garlic extractt1
Interactor
spider mitesTetranychidaee0pest
Outcome
spider mitese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
67.56e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate efficiency against pink bollworm, whitefly, spider mites, green stink bug with maximum reduction percentages of 61.50, 78.89, 67.56 and 54.46%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced green stink bug by up to 54.46%.

Treatment
garlic extractt1
Interactor
green stink buge0pest
Outcome
green stink buge0
Direction
reductione0
Value
54.46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate efficiency against pink bollworm, whitefly, spider mites, green stink bug with maximum reduction percentages of 61.50, 78.89, 67.56 and 54.46%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced predators by up to 62.91% at season end.

Treatment
garlic extractt1
Interactor
predatorse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predatorse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
62.91%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low efficacy against predators except at the end season where the relatively highest reduction percentage was 62.91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced cotton leafworm by 23.30-25.80%, compared with 70.56-90.00% for Dursban.

Treatment
garlic extractt1
Interactor
cotton leafworme0pest
Outcome
cotton leafworm populatione0
Direction
less effectivee0
Value
23.30-25.80%e0
Qualifier
70.56-90.00%e0
Comparator
Dursbane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less effective against the cotton leaf worm ranged 23.30-25.80% reduction in comparison with 70.56-90.00% reduction in cotton leafworm population for Dursban (chloropyrifose)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first garlic program gave the highest sustained control of aphids, whitefly, thrips, and spider mites.

Treatment
first programe0
Outcome
highest sustainable control of aphids, whitefly, thrips and spider mitese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first program tended to be the highest sustainable control of aphids, whitefly, thrips and spider mites on cotton plants, where the sprays started just after cotton plants emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2168 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The third garlic program gave the highest sustained leafhopper control.

Treatment
third programe0
Interactor
leafhoppersCicadellidaee0pest
Outcome
control of leafhopperse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the third program where the sprays started after 20 days of cotton plants emergence was tended to be the highest sustainable control of leafhoppers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2219–2366 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Dursban for N. viridula control near season end.

Interactor
N. viridulaNezara viridulae0pest
Outcome
Dursban can be used as effective insecticidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nezara viridula
Nezara viridula · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In case of N. viridula, it could be decided that the organophosphorous pesticide, Dursban can be used as effective insecticide especially at the end season period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2368–2530 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The third garlic program reduced predator populations by 2.57-21.46%.

Treatment
third programe0
Interactor
predatorse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
predators populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
2.57-21.46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the third program which ranged 2.57-21.46% reduction percentages in predators population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2754–2842 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend garlic extract for control of cotton aphids, leafhoppers, thrips and pink bollworm in IPM.

Outcome
garlic extract could be recommended to be used effectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract could be recommended to be used effectively against cotton aphids, leafhoppers, cotton thrips and pink bollworm in IPM program of cotton pests in cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2848–3022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dursban reduced tested pests by 56.99-96.99%.

Treatment
Dursbane0
Interactor
tested pestse0pest
Outcome
tested pestse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
56.99-96.99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dursban can be considered as good control pesticide against tested pests recorded reduction percentages ranged 56.99-96.99%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3056–3179 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–127 · show in text ↑
t1

“GARLIC EXTRACT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dursban reduced associated predator populations by up to 99.76% near season end.

Treatment
Dursbane1
Interactor
predatorse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
associated predatorse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
99.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“caused serious damage to associated predators on cotton plants at the end of season period recorded reduction percentages reached to 99.76%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3184–3323 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dursban can be considered as good control pesticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3056–3107 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · ecology: diversity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Aphidomorpha · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

botanical · ecology: diversity · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Thrips · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.