Paper · 1986 · Hilgardia

Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton: III. Strategies for control: An economic simulation study

N. D. Stone; A. P. Gutierrez; W. M. Getz; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

I. A Field-Oriented Simulation Model A simulation model for pink bollworm (PBW) and cotton was developed, field validated, and incorporated into an industry sponsored regional PBW management program for southwestern desert cotton. The PBW model differs from earlier versions in its incorporation of stochastic development, the expansion of the concept of physiological time to include nutritional influences of the cotton host on larval development, and its ability to simulate the kinds of data typically collected by pest control advisors when monitoring cotton for pink bollworm. II. A Strategic Management Model A simulation model of pink bollworm populations, as affected by insecticide and pheromone applications in cotton, is described. The simulation results compared favorably to field data. The study indicates that use of sex pheromone for control of pink bollworm by mating disruption inversely depends on density and therefore is most effective in the early season when populations are low. Compared to untreated fields, pheromone-treated fields show delayed population peaks and reduced overall infestation. Pheromone applications in the early season delay but do not obviate the need to spray insecticide to limit infestation levels. III. Strategies for Control: An Economic Simulation Study The cotton-pink bollworm model and the management model developed by Stone and Gutierrez (I and II of this series) are used to evaluate different strategies for controlling pink bollworm in the southwestern desert. Pesticide sprays based on an ultraconservative economic threshold of 2 percent infested bolls are found to be the most profitable in the absence of penalties for heavy insecticide use. Insecticide sprayed on thresholds over 8 percent infested bolls did not control pink bollworm. Pheromone in combination with insecticide greatly enhanced profits and was the best workable strategy tested since a 2 percent threshold is probably too difficult to sample accurately in the field. The efficacy of using early season insecticide applications at and before the first hostable squares are present is discussed, as is the possible impact of early season insecticide applications on beneficial insect populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Pesticide sprays at a 2 percent infested-boll threshold are the most profitable strategy in cotton when no penalties apply for heavy insecticide use.

Treatment
Pesticide sprays based on an ultraconservative economic threshold of 2 percent infested bollse0
Outcome
profite0
Direction
most profitablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pesticide sprays based on an ultraconservative economic threshold of 2 percent infested bolls are found to be the most profitable in the absence of penalties for heavy insecticide use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide sprayed at thresholds over 8 percent infested bolls did not control pink bollworm.

Treatment
Insecticide sprayed on thresholds over 8 percent infested bollse1
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae1pest
Outcome
pink bollworme1
Direction
did not controle1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“Insecticide sprayed on thresholds over 8 percent infested bolls did not control pink bollworm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone combined with insecticide greatly enhanced profits and was the best workable strategy tested.

Treatment
Pheromone in combination with insecticidee2
Outcome
profitse2
Direction
greatly enhancede2
Comparator
strategy testede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pheromone in combination with insecticide greatly enhanced profits and was the best workable strategy tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1802–1910 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Sex pheromone mating disruption of pink bollworm is most effective early in the season when populations are low.

Treatment
use of sex pheromonee3
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae3pest
Outcome
mating disruptione3
Direction
most effectivee3
Qualifier
early season when populations are lowe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e3

“use of sex pheromone for control of pink bollworm by mating disruption inversely depends on density and therefore is most effective in the early season when populations are low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone-treated cotton fields show delayed pink bollworm population peaks compared with untreated fields.

Treatment
pheromone-treated fieldse4
Outcome
population peakse4
Direction
delayede4
Comparator
untreated fieldse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared to untreated fields, pheromone-treated fields show delayed population peaks and reduced overall infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Pheromone-treated cotton fields show reduced overall pink bollworm infestation compared with untreated fields.

Treatment
pheromone-treated fieldse4
Outcome
overall infestatione4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
untreated fieldse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e4

“Compared to untreated fields, pheromone-treated fields show delayed population peaks and reduced overall infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Early-season pheromone applications delay but do not remove the need to spray insecticide to limit infestation.

Treatment
Pheromone applications in the early seasone5
Outcome
need to spray insecticidee5
Direction
do not obviatee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pink bollworm control in southwestern desert cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–51 · show in text ↑
e5

“Pheromone applications in the early season delay but do not obviate the need to spray insecticide to limit infestation levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1247 · show in text ↑

pheromone · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

insecticide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 59 positive, 17 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

infection · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
    Untreated infestations caused significant yield losses versus insecticide treatment from first boll formation.

    Pink Bollworm Suppression Through Crop Termination12 · 1978 · compared with treated with insecticides on schedule from the time of 1 st boll formation

    Same direction

See all 3 papers →

application · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

insecticide · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

infection · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.