Paper · 2017 · HortScience

Growth Suppression by Exogenous Abscisic Acid and Uniconazole for Prolonged Marketability of Tomato Transplants in Commercial Conditions

Shinsuke Agehara; Daniel I. Leskovar

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Vegetable transplants grown in commercial high-density trays can quickly outgrow the optimal size for shipping and transplanting, limiting transplant performance, and marketing flexibility for commercial nurseries. Abscisic acid (ABA) and uniconazole can suppress shoot growth by inducing stress-adaptive responses and inhibiting gibberellin synthesis, respectively. We evaluated the effectiveness of the two growth regulators in prolonging marketability of ‘Florida 91’ and ‘Mariana’ tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) transplants at commercial nursery greenhouses in Texas and Florida. Spray treatments in the Texas experiment were 0 and 3.8 m m ABA at 7, 5, 3, or 1 days before maturity (DBM), and those in the Florida experiment were no spray control, 3.8 m m ABA at 7, 5, 3, or 1 DBM, and 34 μ m uniconazole at 4 DBM. Both ABA and uniconazole showed minimal cultivar-specific effects. Different growth modifications were induced by ABA and uniconazole. First, suppression of stem elongation by ABA was reversible by 7 days after maturity (DAM), whereas that by uniconazole lasted for 20 days or until 16 DAM with up to 15% suppression in stem elongation. Second, only ABA inhibited leaf expansion and shoot dry matter accumulation. The primary growth-modulating effect of uniconazole was limited to height control, which is beneficial for producing compact transplants, rather than as a growth holding strategy. By contrast, the overall growth suppression by ABA is desirable for prolonging transplant marketability. Importantly, the magnitude of this growth suppression was moderate (up to 22% shoot biomass reduction at 8 DAM) and transient, followed by a rapid recovery. Furthermore, ABA caused relatively smaller inhibition in root growth, allowing sufficient root development and increasing the root-to-shoot ratio at 0 to 8 DAM. The growth suppression by ABA was maximal when it was applied at 7 to 5 DBM, indicating the age-dependent sensitivity of tomato seedlings to exogenous ABA. Although leaf chlorosis was induced by ABA in a similar age-dependent manner, it was transient and reversible by 7 DAM. These results suggest that ABA application 7 to 5 DBM is an effective growth holding strategy for tomato transplants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA and uniconazole had minimal cultivar-specific effects on tomato transplants.

Outcome
cultivar-specific effectse0
Qualifier
minimale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Both ABA and uniconazole showed minimal cultivar-specific effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–887 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA suppressed stem elongation of tomato transplants, reversibly by 7 days after maturity.

Treatment
ABAe1
Outcome
stem elongatione1
Direction
suppressione1
Qualifier
reversible by 7 days after maturity (DAM)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“suppression of stem elongation by ABA was reversible by 7 days after maturity (DAM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole suppressed stem elongation of tomato transplants by up to 15%, lasting 20 days or until 16 DAM.

Treatment
uniconazolee2
Outcome
stem elongatione2
Direction
suppressione2
Value
up to 15%e2
Qualifier
lasted for 20 days or until 16 DAMe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e2

“that by uniconazole lasted for 20 days or until 16 DAM with up to 15% suppression in stem elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only ABA inhibited leaf expansion and shoot dry matter accumulation of tomato transplants.

Treatment
ABAe3
Outcome
leaf expansion and shoot dry matter accumulatione3
Direction
inhibitede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e3

“only ABA inhibited leaf expansion and shoot dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole effect on tomato transplants was limited to height control.

Treatment
uniconazolee4
Outcome
height controle4
Direction
limitede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e4

“The primary growth-modulating effect of uniconazole was limited to height control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1317 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growth suppression by ABA is desirable for prolonging tomato transplant marketability.

Outcome
prolonging transplant marketabilitye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e5

“the overall growth suppression by ABA is desirable for prolonging transplant marketability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA reduced shoot biomass of tomato transplants by up to 22% at 8 DAM, moderately and transiently.

Treatment
ABAe5
Outcome
shoot biomasse6
Direction
reductione6
Value
up to 22%e6
Qualifier
at 8 DAMe6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e6

“the magnitude of this growth suppression was moderate (up to 22% shoot biomass reduction at 8 DAM) and transient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1646 · show in text ↑
e5

“by ABA is desirable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA caused smaller inhibition of root growth in tomato transplants.

Treatment
ABAe7
Outcome
root growthe7
Direction
smaller inhibitione7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e7

“ABA caused relatively smaller inhibition in root growth, allowing sufficient root development and increasing the root-to-shoot ratio at 0 to 8 DAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA increased the root-to-shoot ratio of tomato transplants at 0 to 8 DAM.

Treatment
ABAe7
Outcome
root-to-shoot ratioe7
Direction
increasinge7
Qualifier
at 0 to 8 DAMe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e7

“ABA caused relatively smaller inhibition in root growth, allowing sufficient root development and increasing the root-to-shoot ratio at 0 to 8 DAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth suppression by ABA was maximal when ABA was applied at 7 to 5 DBM.

Treatment
ABAe6
Outcome
growth suppressione6
Direction
maximale6
Qualifier
applied at 7 to 5 DBMe6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e6

“The growth suppression by ABA was maximal when it was applied at 7 to 5 DBM, indicating the age-dependent sensitivity of tomato seedlings to exogenous ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA induced transient leaf chlorosis in tomato transplants, reversible by 7 DAM.

Treatment
ABAe7
Outcome
leaf chlorosise7
Direction
inducede7
Qualifier
transient and reversible by 7 DAMe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e7

“Although leaf chlorosis was induced by ABA in a similar age-dependent manner, it was transient and reversible by 7 DAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1995–2113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

ABA application at 7 to 5 DBM is an effective growth holding strategy for tomato transplants.

Outcome
effective growth holding strategye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–111 · show in text ↑
e7

“These results suggest that ABA application 7 to 5 DBM is an effective growth holding strategy for tomato transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2115–2231 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

uniconazole · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

22 papers: 16 positive, 6 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

uniconazole · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.