Paper · 2017 · Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

Residual effects of different green manures on the growth and yield of wheat

Tahsina Sharmin Hoque; Farhana Akter; Md Rafiqul Islam

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Green manures can enrich soils with organic matter and nitrogen. An experiment was conducted at the Soil Science Field Laboratory of Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh to evaluate the residual effects of different green manures on the growth and yield of wheat (BARI Gom-26). The experiment containing nine treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The treatments were T1 [No green manure + 100% Recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN)], T2 (Sesbania aculeata + 75% RDN), T3 (Sesbania aculeata + 50% RDN), T4 (Sesbania rostrata + 75% RDN), T5 (Sesbania rostrata + 50% RDN), T6 (Vigna radiata + 75% RDN), T7 (Vigna radiata + 50% RDN), T8 (Vigna mungo + 75% RDN), and T9 (Vigna mungo + 50% RDN). Residual effects of green manures with RDN significantly increased the yield attributes as well as grain and straw yields of wheat. Further, green manures exerted significant residual effects on grain, straw and total N uptake of wheat. Among various treatments with green manures, the performance of T4 (Sesbania rostrata + 75% RDN) was the best as it produced the highest grain yield (4.28 t ha-1), straw yield (4.74 t ha-1) and total N uptake (108.02 kg ha-1). The use of green manures slightly increased the organic matter content, total N and available P, K, and S contents of the post-harvest soils. As regards to the contribution of various green manures on yield contributing characters and yield of wheat, performances of two Sesbania species viz., S. aculeata and S. rostrata in association with 75% N fertilizer were effective.Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. December 2016, 2(4): 624-630

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manures with recommended nitrogen doses significantly increased wheat yield attributes.

Treatment
green manures with RDNe0
Outcome
yield attributese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual effects of green manures with RDN significantly increased the yield attributes as well as grain and straw yields of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manures with recommended nitrogen doses significantly increased wheat grain and straw yields.

Treatment
green manures with RDNe0
Outcome
grain and straw yields of wheate0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual effects of green manures with RDN significantly increased the yield attributes as well as grain and straw yields of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manures significantly affected wheat grain, straw, and total nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
green manurese0
Outcome
grain, straw and total N uptake of wheate0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“green manures exerted significant residual effects on grain, straw and total N uptake of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest wheat grain yield of 4.28 t ha-1.

Treatment
Sesbania rostrata + 75% RDNe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.28 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 (Sesbania rostrata + 75% RDN) was the best as it produced the highest grain yield (4.28 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1158 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest wheat straw yield of 4.74 t ha-1.

Treatment
Sesbania rostrata + 75% RDNe0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.74 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 (Sesbania rostrata + 75% RDN) was the best as it produced the highest grain yield (4.28 t ha-1), straw yield (4.74 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest total nitrogen uptake of 108.02 kg ha-1.

Treatment
Sesbania rostrata + 75% RDNe0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
108.02 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 (Sesbania rostrata + 75% RDN) was the best as it produced the highest grain yield (4.28 t ha-1), straw yield (4.74 t ha-1) and total N uptake (108.02 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure slightly increased postharvest soil organic matter and total nitrogen.

Treatment
green manurese0
Outcome
organic matter content, total Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedOrgan / stageComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of green manures slightly increased the organic matter content, total N and available P, K, and S contents of the post-harvest soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure slightly increased available phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur in postharvest soil.

Treatment
green manurese0
Outcome
available P, K, and S contents of the post-harvest soilse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of green manures slightly increased the organic matter content, total N and available P, K, and S contents of the post-harvest soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. aculeata with 75% nitrogen fertilizer was effective for wheat yield traits and yield.

Treatment
S. aculeatae0
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
75% N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. aculeata and S. rostrata in association with 75% N fertilizer were effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. rostrata with 75% nitrogen fertilizer was effective for wheat yield traits and yield.

Treatment
S. rostratae0
Outcome
effectivee0
Qualifier
75% N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. aculeata and S. rostrata in association with 75% N fertilizer were effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–76 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.