Paper · 2000 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Yields and Nitrogen Dynamics in a Rice–Wheat System Using Green Manure and Inorganic Fertilizer

Milkha S. Aulakh; Tejinder S. Khera; John W. Doran; et al.

14
claims
18
verbatim quotes
144
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Integrating fertilizer N (FN) with legume green manures (GM) can foster sustainable and environmentally sound agricultural systems in subtropical, semiarid soils low in organic matter. A 4‐yr replicated field experiment with irrigated rice ( Oryza sativa L.) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) rotations was conducted on a sandy loam soil in the Punjab of India to evaluate the effects of incorporating cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata L.) or sesbania ( Sesbania aculeata L.) GM on crop productivity, N‐use efficiency, and NO 3 leaching. Rice grain yields with pretransplant incorporation of 20 and 40 Mg GM ha −1 (GM 20 and GM 40 ) ranged from 5.18 to 5.81 Mg ha −1 , which were equivalent to the 5.40 Mg ha −1 obtained with 120 kg FN ha −1 (FN 120 ). Rice yield with 60 kg FN ha −1 (FN 60 ) and GM 20 was double the control yield and 6% greater than the FN 120 treatment. Nitrogen utilization by rice was greater for GM 20 than FN, as indicated by greater fertilizer N equivalents and an apparent N recovery by rice of 79 vs. 63%. While FN had no residual effects, residual GM produced greater wheat yields, indicating that FN applied to wheat could be reduced by 25%. Soil NO 3 –N leaching to 60 cm in the rice crop was apparently used by the subsequent wheat crop, which has a deeper and more extensive rooting system. After 4 yr, use of FN 120 for both crops resulted in 35 kg of residual NO 3 –N ha −1 in the 150‐cm soil profile (74% below 90 cm), whereas only 19 kg NO 3 –N ha −1 remained with GM 20 plus FN 60 . Use of GM 20 with FN 60 for a rice–wheat rotation demonstrated greater yields of rice and wheat, 25 to 50% reduction in fertilizer N use, and decreased potential for groundwater NO 3 contamination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield with GM20 and GM40 was 5.18 to 5.81 Mg ha−1, equivalent to FN120 yield.

Treatment
20 and 40 Mg GM ha −1e0
Outcome
Rice grain yieldse0
Direction
equivalente0
Value
5.18 to 5.81 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
5.40 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
FN 120e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice grain yields with pretransplant incorporation of 20 and 40 Mg GM ha −1 (GM 20 and GM 40 ) ranged from 5.18 to 5.81 Mg ha −1 , which were equivalent to the 5.40 Mg ha −1 obtained with 120 kg FN ha −1 (FN 120 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield with FN60 plus GM20 doubled the control yield.

Treatment
60 kg FN ha −1 (FN 60 ) and GM 20e0
Outcome
Rice yielde0
Direction
doublee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield with 60 kg FN ha −1 (FN 60 ) and GM 20 was double the control yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield with FN60 plus GM20 exceeded FN120 by 6%.

Treatment
60 kg FN ha −1 (FN 60 ) and GM 20e0
Outcome
Rice yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
FN 120 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yield with 60 kg FN ha −1 (FN 60 ) and GM 20 was double the control yield and 6% greater than the FN 120 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen use was greater under GM20 than fertilizer N.

Treatment
GM 20e0
Outcome
Nitrogen utilization by ricee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
FNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen utilization by rice was greater for GM 20 than FN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent rice nitrogen recovery was 79% under GM versus 63% under fertilizer N.

Treatment
GM 20e0
Outcome
apparent N recovery by ricee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
79 vs. 63%e0
Comparator
FNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen utilization by rice was greater for GM 20 than FN, as indicated by greater fertilizer N equivalents and an apparent N recovery by rice of 79 vs. 63%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer N had no residual effect on subsequent wheat yield.

Treatment
FNe0
Outcome
residual effectse0
Direction
no residual effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“While FN had no residual effects, residual GM produced greater wheat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual green manure increased subsequent wheat yield.

Treatment
residual GMe0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“residual GM produced greater wheat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer wheat fertilizer N could be reduced by 25% after green manure.

Outcome
FN applied to wheat could be reducede0
Value
25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FN applied to wheat could be reduced by 25%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1163 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrate leached to 60 cm during rice appeared to be used by subsequent wheat.

Outcome
Soil NO 3 –N leaching to 60 cme0
Qualifier
apparently used by the subsequent wheat crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil NO 3 –N leaching to 60 cm in the rice crop was apparently used by the subsequent wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1260 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After four years FN120 for both crops left 35 kg residual nitrate per hectare in the soil profile.

Treatment
FN 120e0
Outcome
residual NO 3 –Ne0
Value
35 kg of residual NO 3 –N ha −1e0
Qualifier
74% below 90 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“use of FN 120 for both crops resulted in 35 kg of residual NO 3 –N ha −1 in the 150‐cm soil profile (74% below 90 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM20 plus FN60 left 19 kg nitrate per hectare after four years.

Treatment
GM 20 plus FN 60e0
Outcome
NO 3 –Ne0
Value
19 kg NO 3 –N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only 19 kg NO 3 –N ha −1 remained with GM 20 plus FN 60”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM20 with FN60 produced greater rice and wheat yields.

Treatment
GM 20 with FN 60e0
Outcome
yields of rice and wheate0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of GM 20 with FN 60 for a rice–wheat rotation demonstrated greater yields of rice and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1608 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM20 with FN60 reduced fertilizer N use by 25 to 50%.

Outcome
fertilizer N usee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
25 to 50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“25 to 50% reduction in fertilizer N use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GM20 with FN60 decreased potential groundwater nitrate contamination.

Outcome
potential for groundwater NO 3 contaminatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased potential for groundwater NO 3 contamination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.