Paper · 2000 · HortScience

113 Ethylene Mediates Responses of `Gala' Apple Fruit to Ionizing Irradiation

Xuetong Fan; David Buchanan; Luiz Argenta; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pre-climacteric `Gala' apple fruit treated with air (control) or 2 μmol·L –1 1-methylcyclopropene (MCP) were exposed to gamma irradiation at 0, 0.5, 1, or 1.5 kGy at 23 °C. Fruit were held at 20 °C for 3 weeks after treatment during which respiration rate, production of ethylene and other volatile compounds, fruit firmness, soluble solid content, titratable acidity, and irradiation injury were determined. MCP treatment reduced respiration and ethylene production and slowed loss of fruit firmness and titratable acidity. Irradiation induced increased respiration of MCP-treated fruit in a dosage-dependent fashion. Irradiation caused a decrease in ethylene production by control (non-MCP) fruit, and the magnitude of the decrease was dependent on irradiation dosage. Irradiation at 0.5, 1, and 1.5 kGy stimulated ethylene production of MCP-treated fruit for only 1 day after treatment. Irradiation induced internal browning and the injury severity increased with dosage. The severity and incidence of irradiation damage were higher in MCP-treated fruit than control fruit. The results indicate that ethylene is involved in mediating apple fruit responses to irradiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCP reduced respiration in Gala apple fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
MCP treatmente0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MCP treatment reduced respiration and ethylene production and slowed loss of fruit firmness and titratable acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCP reduced ethylene production in Gala apple fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
MCP treatmente0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MCP treatment reduced respiration and ethylene production and slowed loss of fruit firmness and titratable acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MCP slowed loss of apple fruit firmness and titratable acidity.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
MCP treatmente0
Outcome
fruit firmness and titratable aciditye0
Direction
slowed losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MCP treatment reduced respiration and ethylene production and slowed loss of fruit firmness and titratable acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation increased respiration of MCP-treated apple fruit with dose.

Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a dosage-dependent fashione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation induced increased respiration of MCP-treated fruit in a dosage-dependent fashion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation decreased ethylene production of control apple fruit in a dose-dependent manner.

Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
dependent on irradiation dosagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation caused a decrease in ethylene production by control (non-MCP) fruit, and the magnitude of the decrease was dependent on irradiation dosage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation stimulated ethylene production of MCP-treated apple fruit for one day.

Treatment
Irradiation at 0.5, 1, and 1.5 kGye0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
for only 1 day after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation at 0.5, 1, and 1.5 kGy stimulated ethylene production of MCP-treated fruit for only 1 day after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation induced internal browning in apple fruit.

Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
internal browninge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation induced internal browning and the injury severity increased with dosage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit irradiation injury severity increased with dose.

Treatment
Irradiatione0
Outcome
injury severitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation induced internal browning and the injury severity increased with dosage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation damage severity and incidence were higher in MCP-treated apple fruit than controls.

Treatment
MCP-treatede0
Outcome
severity and incidence of irradiation damagee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The severity and incidence of irradiation damage were higher in MCP-treated fruit than control fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–53 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that ethylene mediates apple fruit responses to irradiation.

Compound
ethylenee0
Outcome
apple fruit responses to irradiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicate that ethylene is involved in mediating apple fruit responses to irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1174 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

radiation · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

radiation · physiology: respiration · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.