Paper · 2008 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Ultraviolet radiation effects on fruit surface respiration and chlorophyll fluorescence

D. Michael Glenn; Jens Wünsche; Ian McIvor; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

SummaryHigh-value fruit crops are exposed to a range of environmental conditions that can reduce fruit quality. Solar injury (SI) or sunburn is a common disorder in tropical, sub-tropical, and temperate climates and is related to: 1) high fruit surface temperature; 2) high visible light intensity; and, 3) ultraviolet radiation (UV). Positional changes in fruit that are caused by increased weight or abrupt changes that result from Summer pruning, limb breakage, or other damage to the canopy can expose fruit to high solar radiation levels, increased fruit surface temperatures, and increased UV exposure that are higher than the conditions to which they are adapted. In our studies, we examined the effects of high fruit surface temperature, saturating photosynthetically-active radiation (PAR), and short-term UV exposure on chlorophyll fluorescence, respiration, and photosynthesis of fruit peel tissues from tropical and temperate fruit in a simulation of these acute environmental changes. All tropical fruits (citrus, macadamia, avocado, pineapple, and custard apple) and the apple cultivars ‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’ increased dark respiration (A0) when exposed to UV, suggesting that UV repair mechanisms were induced. The maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) and the quantum efficiency of photosystem II ( II) were unaffected, indicating no adverse effects on photosystem II (PSII). In contrast, ‘Braeburn’ apple had a reduced Fv/Fm with no increase in A0 on all sampling dates.There was a consistent pattern in all studies.When Fv/Fm was unaffected by UV treatment, A0 increased significantly. Conversely, when Fv/Fm was reduced by UV treatment, then A0 was unaffected. The pattern suggests that when UV repair mechanisms are effective, PSII is adequately protected, and that this protection occurs at the cost of higher respiration. However, when the UV repair mechanisms are ineffective, not only is PSII damaged, but there is additional short-term damage to the repair mechanisms, indicated by a lack of respiration to provide energy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV increased dark respiration in the five named tropical fruit crops.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Material
citrus, macadamia, avocado, pineapple, and custard applee0
Treatment
UVe0
Outcome
dark respiration (A0)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tropical fruits (citrus, macadamia, avocado, pineapple, and custard apple) and the apple cultivars ‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’ increased dark respiration (A0) when exposed to UV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV increased dark respiration in Gala, Gold Rush and Granny Smith apple cultivars.

Material
‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’e0
Treatment
UVe0
Outcome
dark respiration (A0)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the apple cultivars ‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’ increased dark respiration (A0) when exposed to UV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosystem II quantum efficiencies were unaffected by UV in the fruit studies.

Treatment
UVe1
Outcome
maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) and the quantum efficiency of photosystem II ( II)e0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) and the quantum efficiency of photosystem II ( II) were unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1367 · show in text ↑
e1

“All tropical fruits (citrus, macadamia, avocado, pineapple, and custard apple) and the apple cultivars ‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’ increased dark respiration (A0) when exposed to UV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Braeburn apple had reduced Fv/Fm under UV.

Material
‘Braeburn’e0
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Braeburn’ apple had a reduced Fv/Fm with no increase in A0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Braeburn apple had no increase in dark respiration under UV.

Material
‘Braeburn’e0
Outcome
A0e0
Direction
no increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Braeburn’ apple had a reduced Fv/Fm with no increase in A0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1497 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Across studies, unaffected Fv/Fm accompanied significantly increased dark respiration.

Treatment
UV treatmente0
Outcome
A0e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When Fv/Fm was unaffected by UV treatment, A0 increased significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1636 · show in text ↑
e1

“the apple cultivars ‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1140 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across studies, reduced Fv/Fm accompanied unaffected dark respiration.

Treatment
UV treatmente0
Outcome
A0e0
Direction
unaffectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when Fv/Fm was reduced by UV treatment, then A0 was unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1712 · show in text ↑
e1

“the apple cultivars ‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1140 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer effective UV repair protects PSII at the cost of increased respiration.

Outcome
PSII is adequately protectede0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
UV repair mechanisms are effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when UV repair mechanisms are effective, PSII is adequately protected, and that this protection occurs at the cost of higher respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1875 · show in text ↑
e1

“the apple cultivars ‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1140 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer ineffective UV repair coincides with PSII damage and short-term repair damage.

Outcome
PSII damagede0
Qualifier
UV repair mechanisms are ineffectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when the UV repair mechanisms are ineffective, not only is PSII damaged, but there is additional short-term damage to the repair mechanisms, indicated by a lack of respiration to provide energy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–2079 · show in text ↑
e1

“the apple cultivars ‘Gala’, ‘Gold Rush’, and ‘Granny Smith’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1140 · show in text ↑

radiation · physiology: respiration · CitrusPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

radiation · physiology: respiration · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.