Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Evaluation of effect of non-pesticidal methods on population of sucking pest complex on okra in comparison with chemical control

Vaishnavi R Tathode; RS Wasu; Pradnya V Dabhade; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Investigations were carried out to evaluate phototropical, mechanical and botanical control measures in comparison with chemical treatment for managing sucking pest complex of okra under field condition in Dr. PDKV, Akola during kharif, 2019. The results regarding the cumulative effect revealed that treatment Recommended insecticidal spray (Ist Spray and IIIrd Spray with Imidacloprid 17.8% SL, IInd Spray and IVth Spray with Fenvalerate 20% EC) emerged as the most effective treatment against aphids, leafhoppers and whiteflies with realized yield of 52.23 q/ha. It was at par with non-pesticidal treatment Removal of infested shoots + Light traps + NSE (5%) + Yellow sticky trap with yield of 44.49 q/ha followed by Light traps + NSE (5%) in case of leafhopper population whereas in case of aphid and whitefly population treatment Removal of infested shoots + NSE (5%) + Yellow sticky trap at 3, 7 and 14 days after application. This treatments can be better alternative for organic farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended insecticidal spray was most effective against aphids, leafhoppers and whiteflies.

Treatment
Recommended insecticidal spray (Ist Spray and IIIrd Spray with Imidacloprid 17.8% SL, IInd Spray and IVth Spray with Fenvalerate 20% EC)e0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
most effective treatment against aphids, leafhoppers and whitefliese0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment Recommended insecticidal spray (Ist Spray and IIIrd Spray with Imidacloprid 17.8% SL, IInd Spray and IVth Spray with Fenvalerate 20% EC) emerged as the most effective treatment against aphids, leafhoppers and whiteflies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended insecticidal spray yielded 52.23 q/ha.

Outcome
yielde0
Value
52.23 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with realized yield of 52.23 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of infested shoots, light traps, NSE and yellow sticky traps yielded 44.49 q/ha and was at par with chemical treatment.

Treatment
Removal of infested shoots + Light traps + NSE (5%) + Yellow sticky trape0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Value
44.49 q/hae0
Comparator
Ite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was at par with non-pesticidal treatment Removal of infested shoots + Light traps + NSE (5%) + Yellow sticky trap with yield of 44.49 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light traps plus NSE followed the leading treatments for leafhopper population.

Treatment
Light traps + NSE (5%)e0
Interactor
leafhoppere0pest
Outcome
leafhopper populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Light traps + NSE (5%) in case of leafhopper population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of infested shoots, NSE and yellow sticky traps followed for aphid and whitefly population at 3, 7 and 14 days.

Treatment
Removal of infested shoots + NSE (5%) + Yellow sticky trape0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid and whitefly populatione0
Qualifier
3, 7 and 14 days after applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in case of aphid and whitefly population treatment Removal of infested shoots + NSE (5%) + Yellow sticky trap at 3, 7 and 14 days after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–931 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose these non-pesticidal treatments as an alternative for organic farmers.

Outcome
better alternative for organic farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatments can be better alternative for organic farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Aphidomorpha · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

infection · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

light · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.