Paper · 1991 · HortScience

Growth Suppression as a Control for Nectarine Pox

Tara Auxt Baugher; Stephen S. Miller

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A 2-year study was designed to test the effect of four growth-suppressing treatments on the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox, nectarine fruit quality, and the growth and nutritional status of nectarine trees. Root pruning was the only treatment that significantly reduced the incidence of nectarine pox. The percentage of red surface was increased by root pruning, foliar-applied paclobutrazol, and girdling. Root pruning and paclobutrazol suppressed extension shoot growth. Root pruning decreased fruit N, P, K, Mg, Mu, Fe, B, and Zn levels and increased fruit Ca. Results of the study support earlier observations that nectarine pox is associated with excessive shoot growth, excessive levels of fruit N and K, and low levels of fruit Ca. Chemical name used: Beta-[(4-chlorophenyl) methyl] -alpha-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-l- H-1,2,4 -triazole-l-ethanol (paclobutrazol).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning significantly reduced the incidence of nectarine pox.

Treatment
Root pruninge0
Outcome
incidence of nectarine poxe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root pruning was the only treatment that significantly reduced the incidence of nectarine pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–325 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning increased the percentage of red fruit surface.

Treatment
root pruninge1
Outcome
percentage of red surfacee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The percentage of red surface was increased by root pruning, foliar-applied paclobutrazol, and girdling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–430 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied paclobutrazol increased the percentage of red fruit surface.

Treatment
foliar-applied paclobutrazole1
Outcome
percentage of red surfacee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The percentage of red surface was increased by root pruning, foliar-applied paclobutrazol, and girdling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–430 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased the percentage of red fruit surface.

Treatment
girdlinge1
Outcome
percentage of red surfacee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The percentage of red surface was increased by root pruning, foliar-applied paclobutrazol, and girdling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–430 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning suppressed extension shoot growth.

Treatment
Root pruninge2
Outcome
extension shoot growthe2
Direction
suppressede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Root pruning and paclobutrazol suppressed extension shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–496 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol suppressed extension shoot growth.

Treatment
paclobutrazole2
Outcome
extension shoot growthe2
Direction
suppressede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Root pruning and paclobutrazol suppressed extension shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–496 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning decreased fruit N, P and K levels.

Treatment
Root pruninge3
Outcome
fruit N, P, Ke3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Root pruning decreased fruit N, P, K, Mg, Mu, Fe, B, and Zn levels and increased fruit Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–587 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning decreased fruit Mg, Mu and Fe levels.

Treatment
Root pruninge3
Outcome
Mg, Mu, Fee3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Root pruning decreased fruit N, P, K, Mg, Mu, Fe, B, and Zn levels and increased fruit Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–587 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning decreased fruit B and Zn levels.

Organ / stage
fruite3
Treatment
Root pruninge3
Outcome
B, and Zne3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Root pruning decreased fruit N, P, K, Mg, Mu, Fe, B, and Zn levels and increased fruit Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–587 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root pruning increased fruit Ca levels.

Treatment
Root pruninge3
Outcome
fruit Cae3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Root pruning decreased fruit N, P, K, Mg, Mu, Fe, B, and Zn levels and increased fruit Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–587 · show in text ↑
e4

“the incidence of nectarine [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] pox”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–147 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

21 papers: 11 positive, 10 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

pruning · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

64 papers: 42 positive, 22 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

pruning · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.