Paper · 1985 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Time and Severity of Summer Pruning Influences on Young Peach Tree Net Photosynthesis, Transpiration, and Dry Weight Distribution

Curt R. Rom; David C. Ferree

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
40
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Young peach trees 1) trained to a single shoot or 2) allowed to branch, were pruned by removing 50% of current growth at either or both of 2 summer dates. Another group of trees had 0%, 25%, 50%, and 75% shoot growth removed by pruning in midseason. Net photosynthesis (Pn) and transpiration (Tr) were increased within 3 days after pruning at either date. Plants pruned twice at 30-day intervals had a 2nd cycle of increased Pn and Tr, with rates returning to levels of unpruned controls within 24 days. Distribution of water soluble carbohydrates in various plant tissues was not altered by pruning. Pruning at 60 days reduced root starch, whereas pruning again at 90 days increased total root carbohydrate content. Pruning early in the season increased lateral shoot formation, and terminal bud formation was delayed by pruning. Plant dry weight was reduced by all pruning treatments, with delayed pruning and increasing pruning severity resulting in greatest reductions. Distribution of dry weight was not altered substantially by pruning, and a balance of growth was maintained between different plant parts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning increased net photosynthesis and transpiration within three days.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
Net photosynthesis (Pn) and transpiration (Tr)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
within 3 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis (Pn) and transpiration (Tr) were increased within 3 days after pruning at either date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-pruned plants showed a second rise in photosynthesis and transpiration, then returned to unpruned control levels within 24 days.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
pruned twice at 30-day intervalse0
Outcome
Pn and Tre0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
within 24 dayse0
Comparator
unpruned controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants pruned twice at 30-day intervals had a 2nd cycle of increased Pn and Tr, with rates returning to levels of unpruned controls within 24 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning did not alter water soluble carbohydrate distribution across tissues.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
Distribution of water soluble carbohydrates in various plant tissuese0
Direction
not alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Distribution of water soluble carbohydrates in various plant tissues was not altered by pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 60 days reduced root starch.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Pruning at 60 dayse0
Outcome
root starche0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning at 60 days reduced root starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A second pruning at 90 days increased total root carbohydrate content.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
pruning again at 90 dayse0
Outcome
total root carbohydrate contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pruning again at 90 days increased total root carbohydrate content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early pruning increased lateral shoot formation.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
Pruning early in the seasone0
Outcome
lateral shoot formatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pruning early in the season increased lateral shoot formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning delayed terminal bud formation.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
terminal bud formatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“terminal bud formation was delayed by pruning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All pruning treatments reduced plant dry weight, especially later and more severe pruning.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
all pruning treatmentse0
Outcome
Plant dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
delayed pruning and increasing pruning severity resulting in greatest reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant dry weight was reduced by all pruning treatments, with delayed pruning and increasing pruning severity resulting in greatest reductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning did not substantially alter dry weight distribution among plant parts.

Taxon
Peach TreePrunus persicat0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
Distribution of dry weighte0
Direction
not altered substantiallye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Distribution of dry weight was not altered substantially by pruning, and a balance of growth was maintained between different plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–66 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

64 papers: 42 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

pruning · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.