Paper · 2008

An integrated approach to primary and secondary hardening of banana var. Grand Naine

S.R. Vasane; Richa Kothari; Jain Hi-Tech

6
claims
19
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For improving banana productivity, virus-indexed Grand Naine plantlets were used for primary and secondary hardening. Among nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM) used, GNP2V1 medium comprising of peat fortified with nitrogen fixing and phosphate solubilizing microbes (each 1 g/plantlet) and VAM (2 g/plantlet) emerged as the optimal growth medium for primary hardening on the basis of statistically significant 98.9% survival, besides corroborating optimal morphological features (viz. root length, number of primary roots, % VAM colonization, height, girth, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content) at the end of primary hardening. For secondary hardening, among four combinations of bio-fertilizers and VAM used in conjunction with soil, press mud cake (PMC) and vermi-compost (VC), SNP2V1 medium comprising of soil, PMC and VC in a ratio of 1:1:1 (v/v/v) emerged as the optimal growth medium on the basis of statistically significant 97% survival, corroborated by optimal morphological features as above, along with uptake of macroand micro-nutrients. The positive feedback by several monitoring parameters have left no doubt about the integrated outcome at the end of primary and secondary hardening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GNP2V1 medium produced 98.9% survival in primary hardening and was the optimal medium among nine combinations.

Taxon
bananat0
Material
Grand Nainet0
Treatment
GNP2V1 mediume0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
optimale0
Value
98.9%e0
Comparator
nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM)e1

Verbatim

t0

“banana var. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“GNP2V1 medium comprising of peat fortified with nitrogen fixing and phosphate solubilizing microbes (each 1 g/plantlet) and VAM (2 g/plantlet) emerged as the optimal growth medium for primary hardening on the basis of statistically significant 98.9% survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–441 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM) used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GNP2V1 medium supported optimal root length, primary root number and height after primary hardening.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
GNP2V1 mediume1
Outcome
root length, number of primary roots, % VAM colonizatione0
Direction
optimale0
Comparator
nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM)e1

Verbatim

t0

“banana var. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimal morphological features (viz. root length, number of primary roots, % VAM colonization, height, girth, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–627 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM) used, GNP2V1 medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GNP2V1 medium supported optimal height, girth and leaf number after primary hardening.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
GNP2V1 mediume1
Outcome
height, girth, number of leavese0
Direction
optimale0
Comparator
nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM)e1

Verbatim

t0

“banana var. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimal morphological features (viz. root length, number of primary roots, % VAM colonization, height, girth, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–627 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM) used, GNP2V1 medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GNP2V1 medium supported optimal leaf area and chlorophyll content after primary hardening.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
GNP2V1 mediume2
Outcome
leaf area and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
optimale1
Comparator
nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM)e2

Verbatim

t0

“banana var. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf area and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–626 · show in text ↑
e1

“optimal morphological features (viz. root length, number of primary roots, % VAM colonization, height, girth, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–627 · show in text ↑
e2

“Among nine combinations of bio-fertilizers (including VAM) used, GNP2V1 medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP2V1 medium gave 97% survival and was optimal for secondary hardening.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
SNP2V1 mediume0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
optimale0
Value
97%e0
Comparator
four combinations of bio-fertilizers and VAMe0

Verbatim

t0

“banana var. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“among four combinations of bio-fertilizers and VAM used in conjunction with soil, press mud cake (PMC) and vermi-compost (VC), SNP2V1 medium comprising of soil, PMC and VC in a ratio of 1:1:1 (v/v/v) emerged as the optimal growth medium on the basis of statistically significant 97% survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP2V1 medium yielded optimal morphological features and nutrient uptake in secondary hardening.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
SNP2V1 mediume0
Outcome
uptake of macroand micro-nutrientse1
Direction
optimale1
Comparator
four combinations of bio-fertilizers and VAMe2

Verbatim

t0

“banana var. Grand Naine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“SNP2V1 medium comprising of soil, PMC and VC in a ratio of 1:1:1 (v/v/v) emerged as the optimal growth medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–922 · show in text ↑
e1

“corroborated by optimal morphological features as above, along with uptake of macroand micro-nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1081 · show in text ↑
e2

“among four combinations of bio-fertilizers and VAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–736 · show in text ↑

in vitro · disease · MusaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

in vitro · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

68 papers: 58 positive, 10 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

in vitro · physiology: pigments · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · survival · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.