Abstract
By seed dressing method,the effections of 70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder on wheat growth and control of aphids were studied.The results showed that the wheat seedling emergence,growth,tiller number and other physiological indicators of the treatment were significantly higher than those of CK,and seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)could reduce aphid populations significantly in the wheat growing season.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Seed dressing increased wheat seedling emergence and growth significantly relative to CK.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)e0
- Outcome
- seedling emergence,growthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the wheat seedling emergence,growth,tiller number and other physiological indicators of the treatment were significantly higher than those of CK,and seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)could reduce aphid populations significantly in the wheat growing season.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed dressing increased wheat tiller number significantly relative to CK.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)e0
- Outcome
- tiller numbere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the wheat seedling emergence,growth,tiller number and other physiological indicators of the treatment were significantly higher than those of CK,and seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)could reduce aphid populations significantly in the wheat growing season.”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed dressing increased other wheat physiological indicators significantly relative to CK.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)e0
- Outcome
- other physiological indicatorse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the wheat seedling emergence,growth,tiller number and other physiological indicators of the treatment were significantly higher than those of CK,and seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)could reduce aphid populations significantly in the wheat growing season.”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid seed dressing significantly reduced aphid populations during wheat growth.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)e0
- Interactor
- aphide0pest
- Outcome
- aphid populationse0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Qualifier
- wheat growing seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed dressing(70% imidacloprid seed treatment dispersible powder)could reduce aphid populations significantly in the wheat growing season.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →imidacloprid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →imidacloprid · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →seed treatment · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →botanical · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →botanical · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
136 papers more in this group
See all 140 papers →seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
258 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
289 papers more in this group
See all 293 papers →seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
297 papers more in this group
See all 301 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.