Paper · 2018 · Chilean journal of agricultural research

Effect of saponins of Quillaja saponaria extracts in combination with Pseudomonas protegens to control Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici in wheat

Jonathan A. González-Castillo; Tamara P. Quezada-D'Angelo; Gonzalo I. Silva-Aguayo; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Extracts rich in saponins from Quillaja saponaria Mol. and populations of rhizobacteria from the genus Pseudomonas, which produce antimicrobial compounds, have been associated with reduction of the fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici, the causal agent of take-all disease, which is responsible for severe loss of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crops worldwide. However, there is a limited background on the interaction between these bacteria and natural triterpenoids. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of saponin rich extract on Pseudomonas protegens strains 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producers under in vitro and in plant conditions and determining the synergistic effect to be used together to control G. graminis var. tritici in wheat plants. We determined that 8% and 90% of saponins rich Q. saponaria extracts have a differential effect on P. protegens according to their purity (P 0.05). On wheat seedlings, quillaja extract with 90% of saponins did not affect the three antagonistic bacterial strain populations assessed, but affected biofilm formation at saponins concentration of 7360 mg L -1 . Pseudomonas protegens strains had a variable antagonist activity in wheat plants, and controlled the fungus when were combined with different concentrations of pure Q. saponaria extract, with the concentration of 1840 ppm reducing the take-all disease in 32.5% with respect to the control inoculated with G. graminis var. tritici (P 0.05). However, no synergistic effects when the plant extract was combined with the bacterial strains were observed. These results showed the promising and complexity of combining bacterial and plant extract to develop a biopesticide, which could control this fungal disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract purity changed effects on P. protegens.

Interactor
P. protegensPseudomonas protegense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
differential effect on P. protegense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“8% and 90% of saponins rich Q. saponaria extracts have a differential effect on P. protegens according to their purity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90% saponin quillaja extract did not affect three antagonistic bacterial populations on wheat seedlings.

Treatment
quillaja extract with 90% of saponinse0
Outcome
antagonistic bacterial strain populationse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On wheat seedlings, quillaja extract with 90% of saponins did not affect the three antagonistic bacterial strain populations assessed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saponins at 7360 mg L -1 affected bacterial biofilm formation on wheat seedlings.

Treatment
saponins concentration of 7360 mg L -1e0
Outcome
biofilm formatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“affected biofilm formation at saponins concentration of 7360 mg L -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. protegens strains showed variable antagonist activity in wheat plants.

Interactor
Pseudomonas protegensPseudomonas protegense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
variable antagonist activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pseudomonas protegens strains had a variable antagonist activity in wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined P. protegens and Q. saponaria extract at 1840 ppm reduced take-all by 32.5% against pathogen inoculated control.

Treatment
combined with different concentrations of pure Q. saponaria extracte0
Interactor
G. graminis var. triticiGaeumannomyces triticie0pathogen
Outcome
take-all diseasee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
32.5%e0
Comparator
control inoculated with G. graminis var. triticie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“controlled the fungus when were combined with different concentrations of pure Q. saponaria extract, with the concentration of 1840 ppm reducing the take-all disease in 32.5% with respect to the control inoculated with G. graminis var. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1457 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–148 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant extract and bacterial strains showed no synergy.

Outcome
no synergistic effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no synergistic effects when the plant extract was combined with the bacterial strains were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1576 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–148 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 48 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.