Paper · 2004

Study on doubled CO&&_{2}&& concentration reduce the inhibition of enhanced UV--B radiation on tomato in plastic greenhouse

Jun Wang; Fangmin Li; Zhirong Zou; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Under the doubled CO_2 concentration (700 μmol·mol~(-1)),five different doses of UV-B radiation was given to tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in winter plastic greenhouse. The influences on photosynthesis and SOD,POD,CAT activity of tomato were investigated. The results showed that doubled CO_2 concentration increased the leaf chlorophyll content, enhanced the Pn and the activity of antioxidative enzymes. Under the doubled CO_2 concentration, low doses of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))could stimulate the increasing of leaf chlorphyll content and enhancing the activity of antioxidative enzymes. High dose of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))decreased the leaf chlorophyll content and Pn, inhibited the activity of antioxidative enzymes, made stress to tomato plant. Doubled CO_2 concentration could reduce this inhibition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 increased tomato leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
doubled CO_2 concentratione0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content, enhanced the Pne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“doubled CO_2 concentration increased the leaf chlorophyll content, enhanced the Pn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–370 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity in tomato.

Treatment
doubled CO_2 concentratione0
Outcome
activity of antioxidative enzymese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“doubled CO_2 concentration increased the leaf chlorophyll content, enhanced the Pn and the activity of antioxidative enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–412 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under doubled CO2, low UV-B doses stimulated leaf chlorophyll content.

Treatment
low doses of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))e0
Outcome
leaf chlorphyll contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low doses of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))could stimulate the increasing of leaf chlorphyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under doubled CO2, low UV-B doses enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity.

Treatment
low doses of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))e0
Outcome
activity of antioxidative enzymese0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low doses of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))could stimulate the increasing of leaf chlorphyll content and enhancing the activity of antioxidative enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–612 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated high UV-B dose decreased leaf chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
High dose of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))e0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll content and Pne0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High dose of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))decreased the leaf chlorophyll content and Pn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated high UV-B dose inhibited antioxidant enzyme activity.

Treatment
High dose of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))e0
Outcome
activity of antioxidative enzymese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High dose of UV-B radiation(1.163 kJ·m~(-2)·d~(-1))decreased the leaf chlorophyll content and Pn, inhibited the activity of antioxidative enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–759 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 reduced the stated UV-B inhibition.

Treatment
Doubled CO_2 concentratione0
Outcome
this inhibitione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doubled CO_2 concentration could reduce this inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–845 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–146 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

uv · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.