Paper · 2026 · Scientia Horticulturae

Harnessing UV-B and UV-C pre-flowering effect to enhance tomato growth, flowering, and defense under greenhouse conditions

Blanca Montalbán; M.Belén Montero-Palmero; Ana García-Villaraco; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Modern agriculture faces increasing pressure to meet global food demands, leading to intensified practices such as excessive fertilizer use and land expansion, which contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion. Climate change further exacerbates these challenges by altering pathogen dynamics and expanding the geographical range of plant diseases. In this context, ultraviolet (UV) light emerges as a promising tool to reduce fertilizer dependency and control plant pathogens under greenhouse conditions. Moderate doses of UV-B and UV-C have been shown to enhance plant growth, flowering, and defence responses. This study investigates the effects of pre-flowering low-doses UV-B and UV-C radiation on the physiology of tomato plants ( Solanum lycopersicum L.), focusing on biometric traits, photosynthetic performance, flowering and oxidative/redox status. Additionally, the potential of UV treatments to reduce infection by Pseudomonas syringae , a model phytopathogenic bacterium, is evaluated. Initial assays revealed that a 3-minute weekly UV treatment significantly enhanced plant height, flower onset, and photosynthetic efficiency, while avoiding photodamage observed at higher doses. Enhanced pigment content and reduced non-photochemical quenching indicated optimal light utilization. Moderate oxidative stress, evidenced by increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, was accompanied by elevated phenolic compounds, suggesting an adaptive antioxidant response. Furthermore, plants pre-treated with the 3-minute UV dose exhibited reduced pathogen infection, likely due to the activation of innate immunity as suggested by enhanced PR2 and PR3 expression. These findings support the use of controlled UV irradiation as a powerful strategy to improve crop productivity and resilience in sustainable agricultural systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-minute weekly UV treatment significantly increased tomato height.

Treatment
3-minute weekly UV treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 3-minute weekly UV treatment significantly enhanced plant height, flower onset, and photosynthetic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-minute weekly UV treatment significantly advanced tomato flower onset.

Treatment
3-minute weekly UV treatmente0
Outcome
flower onsete0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 3-minute weekly UV treatment significantly enhanced plant height, flower onset, and photosynthetic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-minute weekly UV treatment significantly enhanced tomato photosynthetic efficiency.

Treatment
3-minute weekly UV treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 3-minute weekly UV treatment significantly enhanced plant height, flower onset, and photosynthetic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher UV doses produced photodamage that was avoided with three-minute treatment.

Treatment
a 3-minute weekly UV treatmente1
Outcome
photodamagee0
Direction
avoidinge0
Comparator
higher dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while avoiding photodamage observed at higher doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 3-minute weekly UV treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-treated tomato had enhanced pigment content.

Outcome
pigment contente0
Direction
Enhancede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced pigment content and reduced non-photochemical quenching indicated optimal light utilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-treated tomato had reduced non-photochemical quenching.

Outcome
non-photochemical quenchinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced pigment content and reduced non-photochemical quenching indicated optimal light utilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV treatment increased tomato malondialdehyde levels, indicating moderate oxidative stress.

Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate oxidative stress, evidenced by increased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV treatment elevated tomato phenolic compounds.

Outcome
phenolic compoundse0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was accompanied by elevated phenolic compounds, suggesting an adaptive antioxidant response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-minute UV pretreatment reduced Pseudomonas syringae infection in tomato.

Treatment
3-minute UV dosee0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringaePseudomonas syringaee1pathogen
Outcome
pathogen infectione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants pre-treated with the 3-minute UV dose exhibited reduced pathogen infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1595 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pseudomonas syringae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV pretreatment enhanced PR2 and PR3 expression in tomato.

Gene
PR2 and PR3e0
Outcome
PR2 and PR3 expressione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced PR2 and PR3 expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest innate immunity activation explains reduced infection after UV pretreatment.

Gene
PR2 and PR3e0
Outcome
reduced pathogen infectione0
Qualifier
activation of innate immunitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced pathogen infection, likely due to the activation of innate immunity as suggested by enhanced PR2 and PR3 expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support controlled UV irradiation to improve crop productivity and resilience.

Outcome
use of controlled UV irradiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“support the use of controlled UV irradiation as a powerful strategy to improve crop productivity and resilience in sustainable agricultural systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1856 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

uv · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 12 positive, 15 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.