Paper · 2008 · Jiguang shengwu xuebao

Influence of Propiconazole and Bacillus subtitle B-24 on the Control Effect of Postharvest Anthracnonse of Apple Fruit

Li Li

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of propiconazole and Bacillus subtitle B-24 on the control effect of post harvest anthrancnose of apple fruit and activities of POD and PPO were studied,respectively.Bioassay results showed that propiconazole could inhibit the growth of the hypha of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides.Effective concentration(EC50) of mancozeb and propiconazole to inhibit the growth of hypha was 1 806.984 μg/mL and 0.067 μg/mL,respectively.Post harvest apple fruits were treated with chemical or biological methods respectively.The results showed that Bacillus subtilis B-24 and propiconazole had good control effect to apple anthracnose,there were significant difference(P=0.05) comparing with CK,the decay incidence was low and lesion diameter was small.While the control effects of mancozeb was not obvious.In addition,the activities of POD and PPO in apple fruits with different treatments were measured.The results indicated that the propiconazole and Bacillus subtitle B-24 had induced effect on these two enzymes to some extent.With the rise of the activity,the resistance of host became strong,which could defend infection and expansion of pathogen.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole inhibited Colletotrichum gloeosporioides hyphal growth.

Treatment
propiconazolee0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese0pathogen
Outcome
growth of the hypha of Colletotrichum gloeosporioidese0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“propiconazole could inhibit the growth of the hypha of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb inhibited pathogen hyphal growth at EC50 1 806.984 μg/mL.

Treatment
mancozebe0
Outcome
growth of hyphae0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
1 806.984 μg/mLe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effective concentration(EC50) of mancozeb and propiconazole to inhibit the growth of hypha was 1 806.984 μg/mL and 0.067 μg/mL,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole inhibited pathogen hyphal growth at EC50 0.067 μg/mL.

Treatment
propiconazolee0
Outcome
growth of hyphae0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
0.067 μg/mLe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Effective concentration(EC50) of mancozeb and propiconazole to inhibit the growth of hypha was 1 806.984 μg/mL and 0.067 μg/mL,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis B-24 reduced apple anthracnose decay incidence and lesion diameter versus CK.

Treatment
Bacillus subtilis B-24e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis B-24Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
decay incidence was low and lesion diameter was smalle0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bacillus subtilis B-24 and propiconazole had good control effect to apple anthracnose,there were significant difference(P=0.05) comparing with CK,the decay incidence was low and lesion diameter was small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole reduced apple anthracnose decay incidence and lesion diameter versus CK.

Treatment
propiconazolee0
Outcome
decay incidence was low and lesion diameter was smalle0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bacillus subtilis B-24 and propiconazole had good control effect to apple anthracnose,there were significant difference(P=0.05) comparing with CK,the decay incidence was low and lesion diameter was small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mancozeb did not show obvious anthracnose control.

Treatment
mancozebe0
Outcome
control effectse0
Direction
not obviouse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“the control effects of mancozeb was not obvious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propiconazole induced POD and PPO activities in apple fruit to some extent.

Treatment
propiconazolee0
Outcome
POD and PPOe0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“the activities of POD and PPO in apple fruits with different treatments were measured.The results indicated that the propiconazole and Bacillus subtitle B-24 had induced effect on these two enzymes to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtitle B-24 induced POD and PPO activities in apple fruit to some extent.

Treatment
Bacillus subtitle B-24e0
Interactor
Bacillus subtitle B-24e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
POD and PPOe0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“the activities of POD and PPO in apple fruits with different treatments were measured.The results indicated that the propiconazole and Bacillus subtitle B-24 had induced effect on these two enzymes to some extent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1029 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors linked increased enzyme activity with stronger host resistance against pathogen infection.

Outcome
resistance of hoste0
Qualifier
rise of the activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“With the rise of the activity,the resistance of host became strong,which could defend infection and expansion of pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1151 · show in text ↑

mancozeb · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

propiconazole · Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

propiconazole · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mancozeb · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.