Paper · 2001 · Journal of Xingyang Agricultural College

Influence of foliar fertilization on quality of rice

Wang Weijin

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

At full heading time of rice,foliar fertilization with different density and different component part was sprayed to study the response of fructificative capability and quality of rice.The main results are as follows:every treatments enhanced full-grown grain rate,reduced blighted grain rate,increased the 1000-kernel weight and improved the grinding quality of rice at different degree.The influence of different treatments are not identical.Treatments of spraying potassium phosphate monobasic solution with density of 0.3% two times and the solution that contented 0.1% urea and 0.3% potassium phosphate monobasic has better effect.Influence of foliar fertilization on chalky and cooking quality of rice are not notable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar treatments enhanced full-grown grain rate.

Treatment
foliar fertilizationt0
Outcome
full-grown grain ratee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“every treatments enhanced full-grown grain rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–264 · show in text ↑
t0

“foliar fertilization on quality of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments reduced blighted grain rate.

Treatment
foliar fertilizationt0
Outcome
blighted grain ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced blighted grain rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–292 · show in text ↑
t0

“foliar fertilization on quality of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased 1000-kernel weight.

Treatment
foliar fertilizationt0
Outcome
1000-kernel weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the 1000-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–325 · show in text ↑
t0

“foliar fertilization on quality of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments improved grinding quality.

Treatment
foliar fertilizationt0
Outcome
grinding qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved the grinding quality of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–367 · show in text ↑
t0

“foliar fertilization on quality of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of 0.3% potassium phosphate monobasic had a better effect.

Treatment
spraying potassium phosphate monobasic solution with density of 0.3% two timese0
Outcome
better effecte0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments of spraying potassium phosphate monobasic solution with density of 0.3% two times and the solution that contented 0.1% urea and 0.3% potassium phosphate monobasic has better effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea and potassium phosphate monobasic solution had a better effect.

Treatment
0.1% urea and 0.3% potassium phosphate monobasice0
Outcome
better effecte0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the solution that contented 0.1% urea and 0.3% potassium phosphate monobasic has better effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization had no notable effect on chalky and cooking quality.

Treatment
foliar fertilizatione0
Outcome
chalky and cooking qualitye0
Direction
not notablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Influence of foliar fertilization on chalky and cooking quality of rice are not notable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–723 · show in text ↑

application · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

application · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 41 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 102 positive, 29 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

148 papers: 129 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.