Paper · 2005 · Europe PMC (PubMed Central)

Effect of amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer on yields and qualities of wheat and rice

Liu De-hui; Zhao Haiyan; Zheng Xiuren; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficiency of fertilizers of amino acid chelated microelement was studied under the field conditions in wheat/rice rotation in Rugao County,Jiangsu Province.The results showed that fertilizers of amino acid chelated microelement could obviously increase numbers of ears and grains of single ear and wheat yields.The grain yield of wheat of 5 treatments was in the following order:NPKNPK+IM(NPK+ inorganic microelement)NPK+A(NPK+amino acid powder)NPK+IM+A(NPK+inorganic microelement+amino acid powder)NPK+AM(NPK + amino acid chelated microelement).Variance analysis showed that differences of the yield of wheat between NPK+AM treatment and three other treatments(NPK+A,NPK+IM+A,NPK+IM)were significant(P0.05),and the difference of the yield of wheat between NPK+AM and NPK was significant(P0.01).The protein content of wheat grain of 5 treatments was in the following order:NPK NPK+IM NPK+IM+A NPK+A NPK+AM.Statistical analysis indicated that differences of the protein contents of wheat grain were significant(P0.05)between NPK+AM and NPK+IM,and they were significant(P0.01)between NPK+AM and NPK.Amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer increased the contents of available Mn and Zn in the soils and therefore,also could increase grain yield,protein content of rice plants cultivated in the fields where wheat plants had been harvested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer increased numbers of ears, grains per ear and wheat yield.

Treatment
fertilizers of amino acid chelated microelemente1
Outcome
numbers of ears and grains of single ear and wheat yieldse1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer on yields and qualities of wheat and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The efficiency of fertilizers of amino acid chelated microelement was studied under the field conditions in wheat/rice rotation in Rugao County,Jiangsu Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilizers of amino acid chelated microelement could obviously increase numbers of ears and grains of single ear and wheat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield under the NPK+AM treatment differed significantly from three other treatments (NPK+A, NPK+IM+A and NPK+IM).

Treatment
NPK+AM treatmente2
Outcome
yield of wheate2
Comparator
NPK+A,NPK+IM+A,NPK+IMe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer on yields and qualities of wheat and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Variance analysis showed that differences of the yield of wheat between NPK+AM treatment and three other treatments(NPK+A,NPK+IM+A,NPK+IM)were significant(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content of wheat grain under NPK+AM differed significantly from NPK+IM.

Treatment
NPK+AMe4
Outcome
protein contents of wheat graine4
Comparator
NPK+IMe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer on yields and qualities of wheat and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e4

“Statistical analysis indicated that differences of the protein contents of wheat grain were significant(P0.05)between NPK+AM and NPK+IM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content of wheat grain under NPK+AM differed significantly from NPK alone.

Treatment
NPK+AMe5
Outcome
protein contents of wheat graine4
Comparator
NPKe5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer on yields and qualities of wheat and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e4

“Statistical analysis indicated that differences of the protein contents of wheat grain were significant(P0.05)between NPK+AM and NPK+IM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1046 · show in text ↑
e5

“they were significant(P0.01)between NPK+AM and NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer increased available Mn and Zn contents in the soil.

Treatment
Amino acid chelated microelement fertilizere6
Outcome
contents of available Mn and Zne6
Direction
increasede6
Setting
Rugao County,Jiangsu Provincee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer on yields and qualities of wheat and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The efficiency of fertilizers of amino acid chelated microelement was studied under the field conditions in wheat/rice rotation in Rugao County,Jiangsu Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“Amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer increased the contents of available Mn and Zn in the soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer also increased grain yield and grain protein content of rice grown after wheat.

Taxon
rice plantsOryza sativae7
Treatment
Amino acid chelated microelement fertilizere6
Outcome
grain yield, protein contente7
Direction
increasee7
Setting
Rugao County,Jiangsu Provincee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer on yields and qualities of wheat and rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The efficiency of fertilizers of amino acid chelated microelement was studied under the field conditions in wheat/rice rotation in Rugao County,Jiangsu Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“Amino acid chelated microelement fertilizer increased the contents of available Mn and Zn in the soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1204 · show in text ↑
e7

“also could increase grain yield,protein content of rice plants cultivated in the fields where wheat plants had been harvested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1344 · show in text ↑

amino acid · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

amino acid · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

amino acid · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

amino acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

126 papers: 114 positive, 12 negative or no effect

113 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.