Paper · 2008 · 资源科学

Dynamics and Potential of Water Use Efficiency of Cotton Production in Shihezi Cultivated Area of Xinjiang

Yuyi Li; Fenghua Zhang

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to clarify the dynamic change characteristics and potential of water use efficiency(WUE) of cotton production in Shihezi cultivated area of Xinjiang.Based on the data of cotton yield,precipitation,irrigation water consumption in typical farm,the dynamic change of WUE of cotton production over the past 50 years was calculated,and the potential and major measures for increasing WUE in study area were analyzed.Results showed that cotton yield in Shihezi cultivated area increased from 150kg/ha in the early 1950s to 1 759kg/ha at the present,while water consumption of cotton production during the same period decreased from 477.48mm to 415.00mm,a decrease of 13.09 percent.Over the same period,WUE of cotton increased from 1.07kg/ha/mm to 3.95kg/ha/mm,an increase of 2.69 times.Probably,such measures as soil improvement, increased use of fertilizers and extension of plastic mulched cultivation,and new crop varieties use contributes to the increase of cotton yield and WUE in the region.The optimal amount recommended for nitrogen fertilizer use is 225kg/ha in the region.Regarding the relatively lower nitrogen fertilizer use in the region (200kg/ha currently),the increased nitrogen use could increase cotton yield and water use efficiency.The effect of phosphate fertilizer use on the cotton yield and WUE increase is not significant.Drip irrigation with plastic mulching measures could improve water use efficiency.The drip irrigation with plastic mulching measures could save 35 percent of water resources and result in an increase of 14.88% in cotton yield compared with conventional irrigation practices.The adoption of drought-resistant varieties could also be an approach for the increase of cotton yield and WUE in the region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield in Shihezi increased from 150 kg/ha in the early 1950s to 1 759 kg/ha at present.

Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
150kg/ha in the early 1950s to 1 759kg/hae0
Setting
Shihezi cultivated areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton yield in Shihezi cultivated area increased from 150kg/ha in the early 1950s to 1 759kg/ha at the present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–571 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water consumption of cotton production decreased from 477.48 mm to 415.00 mm, a decrease of 13.09 percent.

Outcome
water consumption of cotton productione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
477.48mm to 415.00mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water consumption of cotton production during the same period decreased from 477.48mm to 415.00mm, a decrease of 13.09 percent”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 578–703 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton WUE increased from 1.07 to 3.95 kg/ha/mm, an increase of 2.69 times.

Outcome
WUE of cottone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.07kg/ha/mm to 3.95kg/ha/mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE of cotton increased from 1.07kg/ha/mm to 3.95kg/ha/mm, an increase of 2.69 times”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 725–808 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Soil improvement, increased fertilizer use, plastic mulched cultivation and new varieties probably contributed to the increase of cotton yield and WUE.

Treatment
soil improvement, increased use of fertilizers and extension of plastic mulched cultivation,and new crop varieties usee0
Outcome
increase of cotton yield and WUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“such measures as soil improvement, increased use of fertilizers and extension of plastic mulched cultivation,and new crop varieties use contributes to the increase of cotton yield and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1005 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended optimal nitrogen fertilizer amount in the region is 225 kg/ha.

Outcome
optimal amount recommended for nitrogen fertilizer usee0
Value
225kg/hae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal amount recommended for nitrogen fertilizer use is 225kg/ha in the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nitrogen use, relative to the current lower use, could increase cotton yield and water use efficiency.

Treatment
increased nitrogen usee0
Outcome
cotton yield and water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
200kg/ha currentlye1
Comparator
lower nitrogen fertilizer use in the regione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increased nitrogen use could increase cotton yield and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1274 · show in text ↑
e1

“relatively lower nitrogen fertilizer use in the region (200kg/ha currently)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of phosphate fertilizer use on the cotton yield and WUE increase is not significant.

Treatment
phosphate fertilizer usee0
Outcome
cotton yield and WUE increasee0
Direction
not significante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of phosphate fertilizer use on the cotton yield and WUE increase is not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with plastic mulching could improve water use efficiency.

Treatment
Drip irrigation with plastic mulching measurese0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation with plastic mulching measures could improve water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1451 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with plastic mulching could save 35 percent of water resources compared with conventional irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic mulching measurese0
Outcome
water resourcese0
Direction
savee0
Value
35 percente0
Comparator
conventional irrigation practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The drip irrigation with plastic mulching measures could save 35 percent of water resources and result in an increase of 14.88% in cotton yield compared with conventional irrigation practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation with plastic mulching could increase cotton yield by 14.88% compared with conventional irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic mulching measurese0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
14.88%e0
Comparator
conventional irrigation practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The drip irrigation with plastic mulching measures could save 35 percent of water resources and result in an increase of 14.88% in cotton yield compared with conventional irrigation practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1643 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adopting drought-resistant varieties could also increase cotton yield and WUE in the region.

Treatment
adoption of drought-resistant varietiese0
Outcome
increase of cotton yield and WUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adoption of drought-resistant varieties could also be an approach for the increase of cotton yield and WUE in the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1768 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

mulching · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 110 positive, 21 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.