Paper · 2018 · Revista Caatinga

SALINE WATER IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON THE CULTIVATION OF COLORED FIBER COTTON

GEOVANI SOARES DE LIMA; ADAAN SUDARIO DIAS; HANS RAJ GHEYI; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT In Northeast Brazil, the cultivation of colored fiber cotton has stood out as one of the agricultural activities of expressive importance because its fiber has various applications in the industry and it is a labor-demanding crop. In this context, this study aimed to evaluate the growth, water consumption, water use efficiency and production of the colored fiber cotton cv. ‘BRS Rubi’, as a function of saline water irrigation and nitrogen (N) doses. The experiment was conducted in lysimeters, under greenhouse conditions, in eutrophic Regolithic Neosol, with a sandy loam texture, in Campina Grande-PB, Brazil. The plants were irrigated using water with electrical conductivities (ECw) of 5.1, 6.1, 7.1, 8.1 and 9.1 dS m-1 and fertilized with N doses (ND) of 65, 100, 135, 170 and 205 mg N kg-1 soil, in a completely randomized block design, with three replicates. Irrigation using water with an ECw above 5.1 dS m-1, hampered growth, water consumption and water use efficiency of ‘BRS Rubi’ cotton. Among the organs, the cotton root system was less affected by the salt stress in comparison to the shoots. N fertilization did not mitigate the deleterious effect of salt stress on cotton growth, water consumption, water use efficiency and production. The interaction between water salinity and N fertilization had positive effects on total weight of seeds and lint, and the highest values were obtained in plants irrigated with water of ECw 7.6 and 7.5 dS m-1 and ND of 65 mg N kg-1 of soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation above ECw 5.1 dS m-1 hampered BRS Rubi cotton growth, water consumption and water use efficiency.

Material
‘BRS Rubi’e0
Treatment
Irrigation using water with an ECw above 5.1 dS m-1e0
Outcome
growth, water consumption and water use efficiencye0
Direction
hamperede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation using water with an ECw above 5.1 dS m-1, hampered growth, water consumption and water use efficiency of ‘BRS Rubi’ cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1011 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton roots were less affected by salt stress than shoots.

Organ / stage
root systeme0
Outcome
affected by the salt stresse0
Direction
less affectede0
Comparator
the shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cotton root system was less affected by the salt stress in comparison to the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization did not mitigate salt-stress effects on cotton growth, water use and production.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
cotton growth, water consumption, water use efficiency and productione0
Direction
did not mitigatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization did not mitigate the deleterious effect of salt stress on cotton growth, water consumption, water use efficiency and production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1263 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The salinity by nitrogen interaction positively affected total seed weight.

Treatment
water salinity and N fertilizatione0
Outcome
total weight of seedse0
Direction
positive effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between water salinity and N fertilization had positive effects on total weight of seeds and lint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The salinity by nitrogen interaction positively affected lint weight.

Treatment
water salinity and N fertilizatione0
Outcome
linte0
Direction
positive effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between water salinity and N fertilization had positive effects on total weight of seeds and lint”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest seed weight occurred at ECw 7.6 dS m-1 and nitrogen 65 mg N kg-1 soil.

Treatment
ECw 7.6 and 7.5 dS m-1 and ND of 65 mg N kg-1 of soile0
Outcome
highest valuese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values were obtained in plants irrigated with water of ECw 7.6 and 7.5 dS m-1 and ND of 65 mg N kg-1 of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–93 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 110 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.