Paper · 2005 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of PP333 spraying on some physiological, morphological characteristics and yield of wheat on dryland with different plant density

LI Sheng-xiu

13
claims
41
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of different concentration PP333, its spraying time and plant growing stages at which PP333 was sprayed, as well as a combination of PP333 and GA3 on some physiological, morphological characteristics and yields of dryland wheat. The experiment included two factors: plant density and spraying PP333. Two levels of the plant density were adopted: low density with sowing rate of 1670000 seeds, and high density with sowing rate of 3340000 seeds. The spraying of PP333 involved 5 treatments: 1) spraying water as control; 2) spraying PP333 at re-growth stage with low concentration (150 mg /kg) ; 3) spraying PP333 at re-growth stage with high concentration (300 mg/kg) ; 4) spraying PP333 at 3 leaf stage, re-growth stage and elongation stage with a concentration of 100 mg/kg; and 5) spraying PP333 at 3-leaf stage, re-growth stage and elongation stage with a concentration of 100 mg/kg and spraying CA3 (30mg/kg) at elongation stage together with PP333 by dissolving CA3 in the PP333 solution. Results show that application of PP333 significantly increased tiller numbers and reduced plant height and leaf area, the degree of reduction depending on concentrations and times: the higher the concentration and the more frequent the applications , the more reduction. In contrast, GA3 alleviated the effect of PP333 on the reduction. No difference was found in chlorophyll content at over-wintering stage for different treatments while the increase was observed at elongation stage by PP333 spraying. Although at elongation stage, no significant difference was found in NRA, NH4+-N and NO3--N content among different treatments, NRA was inhibited at over-wintering stage by PP333 spraying. Application of PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stage, although reducing grain number per ear, obviously increased the harvesting ear numbers and raised or retained the weight per 1000 grains, and thereby increased wheat yield by 5.8% . Application of PP333 alone showed no significant effect on crop yield. Different results obtained by spraying PP333 on wheat at different stages and with different plant densities might be related with water and nutrient supply of the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PP333 significantly increased wheat tiller numbers.

Treatment
PP333e0
Outcome
tiller numberse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of PP333 significantly increased tiller numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1126 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PP333 reduced wheat plant height, with greater reduction at higher concentrations and more frequent applications.

Treatment
PP333e3
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
the higher the concentration and the more frequent the applications , the more reductione0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced plant height and leaf area, the degree of reduction depending on concentrations and times: the higher the concentration and the more frequent the applications , the more reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of PP333 significantly increased tiller numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PP333 reduced wheat leaf area, more strongly with higher concentrations and more frequent applications.

Treatment
PP333e3
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced plant height and leaf area, the degree of reduction depending on concentrations and times: the higher the concentration and the more frequent the applications , the more reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1319 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of PP333 significantly increased tiller numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 alleviated the reduction caused by PP333 in wheat.

Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
alleviatede0
Comparator
PP333e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA3 alleviated the effect of PP333 on the reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat chlorophyll content did not differ between treatments at the over-wintering stage.

Organ / stage
over-wintering stagee0
Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
No differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No difference was found in chlorophyll content at over-wintering stage for different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PP333 increased wheat chlorophyll content at the elongation stage.

Organ / stage
elongation stagee0
Treatment
PP333 sprayinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente2
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase was observed at elongation stage by PP333 spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1551 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NRA, NH4+-N and NO3--N content did not differ significantly among wheat treatments at elongation.

Organ / stage
elongation stagee0
Outcome
NRA, NH4+-N and NO3--N contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at elongation stage, no significant difference was found in NRA, NH4+-N and NO3--N content among different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1679 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PP333 inhibited wheat NRA at over-wintering.

Organ / stage
over-wintering stagee0
Treatment
PP333 sprayinge0
Outcome
NRAe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NRA was inhibited at over-wintering stage by PP333 spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1681–1740 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The staged PP333 and GA3 treatment reduced grain number per ear.

Treatment
PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stagee0
Outcome
grain number per eare0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stage, although reducing grain number per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1878 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The staged PP333 and GA3 treatment increased harvest ear numbers.

Treatment
PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stagee4
Outcome
harvesting ear numberse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“obviously increased the harvesting ear numbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1926 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1838 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The staged PP333 and GA3 treatment raised or retained thousand grain weight.

Treatment
PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stagee4
Outcome
weight per 1000 grainse0
Direction
raised or retainede0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“raised or retained the weight per 1000 grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–1976 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1838 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The staged PP333 and GA3 treatment increased wheat yield by 5.8%.

Treatment
PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stagee4
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.8%e0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased wheat yield by 5.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2019 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of PP333 at the 3-leaf stage, followed by spraying PP333 and GA3 at elongation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1742–1838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PP333 alone had no significant effect on wheat crop yield.

Treatment
PP333 alonee0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Comparator
spraying water as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of PP333 alone showed no significant effect on crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2092 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying water as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–97 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

paclobutrazol · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

paclobutrazol · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.