Paper · 2013

Application of Biological and Chemical Fertilizers on some Qualitative and Quantitative Traits in Forage Sorghum

SN Eshaghi Sardrood; S Nasrollah Zadeh; A Bagheri Pirouz

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Management of soil fertility via biological fertilizers application is one of the most important components of sustainable agriculture. On this basis, in order to investigate the effect of biological and chemical fertilizers on some qualitative and quantitative traits in forage sorghum, a field study was conducted as factorial experiment based on RCBD (Randomized complete block design) with three replications during growth season 2011 in Research Farm of Faculty of Agriculture at University of Tabriz. The first factor consisted of chemical fertilizer levels of 210 Kg/ha urea (100%), 150 Kg/ha super phosphate triple (100%), urea (100%) + super phosphate triple (S.P.T, 100%), urea 50% + S.P.T. 50%, and control. The second factor comprised biofertilizer levels of biosuper, phosphate barvar-2, biosuper + phosphate barvar-2 and control. Results showed that sorghum can produce three harvests during a growth season under Tabriz climates. The highest and the lowest forage yield and plant height were observed in treatment combinations of urea (100%) + S.P.T. (100%) + phosphate Barvar-2 and control. The highest and lowest percentage NDF and ADF were observed in treatment control and 50% urea + 50% S.P.T. + phosphate barvar-2, respectively. Also the highest tiller number per plant and the percentage of protein in the urea treatment and the lowest was in control. Therefore, it was concluded that integrated application of chemical and bio fertilizers at three harvests was superior to the treatments and sorghum forage yield was increased significantly in compared to chemical and bio-fertilizers usage, separately.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum produced three harvests in one growing season under Tabriz climates.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
harvestse0
Value
three harvestse0
Setting
Tabrize0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that sorghum can produce three harvests during a growth season under Tabriz climates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined urea, superphosphate and phosphate Barvar-2 treatment gave the highest forage yield relative to control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
urea (100%) + S.P.T. (100%) + phosphate Barvar-2e0
Outcome
forage yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and the lowest forage yield and plant height were observed in treatment combinations of urea (100%) + S.P.T. (100%) + phosphate Barvar-2 and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined urea, superphosphate and phosphate Barvar-2 treatment gave the highest plant height relative to control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
urea (100%) + S.P.T. (100%) + phosphate Barvar-2e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and the lowest forage yield and plant height were observed in treatment combinations of urea (100%) + S.P.T. (100%) + phosphate Barvar-2 and control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NDF percentage was lowest with 50% urea plus 50% S.P.T. plus phosphate barvar-2 relative to control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50% urea + 50% S.P.T. + phosphate barvar-2e0
Outcome
NDFe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and lowest percentage NDF and ADF were observed in treatment control and 50% urea + 50% S.P.T. + phosphate barvar-2, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ADF percentage was lowest with 50% urea plus 50% S.P.T. plus phosphate barvar-2 relative to control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
50% urea + 50% S.P.T. + phosphate barvar-2e0
Outcome
ADFe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest and lowest percentage NDF and ADF were observed in treatment control and 50% urea + 50% S.P.T. + phosphate barvar-2, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea treatment gave the highest tiller number per plant relative to control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
urea treatmente0
Outcome
tiller number per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also the highest tiller number per plant and the percentage of protein in the urea treatment and the lowest was in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea treatment gave the highest percentage of protein relative to control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
urea treatmente0
Outcome
percentage of proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also the highest tiller number per plant and the percentage of protein in the urea treatment and the lowest was in control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Forage Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated chemical and biofertilizer application significantly increased sorghum forage yield versus separate applications.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
integrated application of chemical and bio fertilizerse0
Outcome
sorghum forage yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
chemical and bio-fertilizers usage, separatelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrated application of chemical and bio fertilizers at three harvests was superior to the treatments and sorghum forage yield was increased significantly in compared to chemical and bio-fertilizers usage, separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1626 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · SorghumResults differ

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

nitrogen · growth · SorghumResults differ

93 papers: 81 positive, 12 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

phosphorus · yield · SorghumResults differ

105 papers: 92 positive, 13 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

phosphorus · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

286 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.