Paper · 2010 · Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences

Bio-Organic Farming of Grain Sorghum and its Effect on Growth, Physiological and Yield Parameters and Antioxidant Enzymes Activity

Amal G. Ahmed; Salwa Orabi; A. M. Gomaa

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted in the new land of Youssef El-Sedeek, Fayoum Governorate, Egypt during the two successive seasons of 2007 and 2008 to investigate the influence of certain bio-organic farming treatments on growth parameters, yield, chemical constituents and some enzyme activities of sorghum varieties i.e, Dorado and Giza 15. The obtained results indicated that sorghum cultivars Dorado and Giza 15 were significantly different for the studied growth parameters at 40, 70 and 100 days old and yield and its components except the specific leaf area that was insignificant. Dorado c.v. surpassed Giza 15 cv. in dry weight/plant, LA, LAI, LAR, SLW , weight of panicle, grainspanicle, shelling %, seed index, straw yield/plant, biological yield/plant, grain yield (ton/fed)., straw yield (ton/fed)., biological yield (ton/fed). and harvest index. There were significant differences of growth characters and yield and its components except specific leaf area and harvest index obtained when plant were applied by bio-fertilizer. the combined inoculation with Azotobacter vinelandlii and Pseudomonas fluorescens surpassed the single inoculation either in presence of full or double full dose of organic manure in all characters but the positive control of the recommended doses of NPK recorded the highest significant values in all growth characters at all tested plant ages and yield and its components, while the combined inoculation treatment in presence of either full or double full organic matter dose came in the second order. The effect of interaction between sorghum cultivars and bio-fertilizer showed a significant effect on all parameters under study except specific leaf weight, it is obvious from the results that Dorado cultivar fertilized with bio-fertilizer gave the highest results at most characters under study. In comparison with the positive control, comparable results, without significant differences, were obtained due to the application of diverse bio-organic treatments for phosphorus and potassium grain content. For nitrogen and protein grain content, the positive control recorded the highest values. As to the enzymes activities of peroxidase, and catalase, application of the double full dose of organic manure and the combined inoculum of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas increased both peroxidase and catalase irrespective of the tested sorghum varieties. Giza 15 sorghum variety showed high enzyme activities when compared to Dorado variety. The positive control recorded the lowest values of the activities of the tested enzymes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dorado and Giza 15 differed significantly in growth and yield components, except specific leaf area.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Material
Dorado and Giza 15e0
Outcome
growth parameters at 40, 70 and 100 days old and yield and its componentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum cultivars Dorado and Giza 15 were significantly different for the studied growth parameters at 40, 70 and 100 days old and yield and its components except the specific leaf area that was insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dorado surpassed Giza 15 in listed growth and yield traits.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
Doradoe0
Outcome
dry weight/plant, LA, LAI, LAR, SLWe0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Giza 15e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dorado c.v. surpassed Giza 15 cv. in dry weight/plant, LA, LAI, LAR, SLW , weight of panicle, grainspanicle, shelling %, seed index, straw yield/plant, biological yield/plant, grain yield (ton/fed)., straw yield (ton/fed)., biological yield (ton/fed). and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer significantly affected growth and yield components, except specific leaf area and harvest index.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
bio-fertilizere0
Outcome
growth characters and yield and its componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant differences of growth characters and yield and its components except specific leaf area and harvest index obtained when plant were applied by bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Azotobacter and Pseudomonas inoculation surpassed single inoculation across measured characters.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
combined inoculation with Azotobacter vinelandlii and Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Interactor
Azotobacter vinelandliie0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
all characterse0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
single inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined inoculation with Azotobacter vinelandlii and Pseudomonas fluorescens surpassed the single inoculation either in presence of full or double full dose of organic manure in all characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Recommended NPK doses gave the highest growth and yield values.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
recommended doses of NPKe0
Outcome
growth characters at all tested plant ages and yield and its componentse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the positive control of the recommended doses of NPK recorded the highest significant values in all growth characters at all tested plant ages and yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-organic treatments gave phosphorus and potassium grain contents comparable to positive control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
diverse bio-organic treatmentse0
Outcome
phosphorus and potassium grain contente0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
positive controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparable results, without significant differences, were obtained due to the application of diverse bio-organic treatments for phosphorus and potassium grain content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–2054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Positive control had the highest grain nitrogen and protein content.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
nitrogen and protein grain contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For nitrogen and protein grain content, the positive control recorded the highest values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2056–2144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double organic manure with combined inoculum increased peroxidase and catalase activities.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
double full dose of organic manure and the combined inoculum of Azotobacter and Pseudomonase0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
peroxidase and catalasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of the double full dose of organic manure and the combined inoculum of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas increased both peroxidase and catalase irrespective of the tested sorghum varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2204–2398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 15 had higher enzyme activity than Dorado.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Material
Giza 15e0
Outcome
enzyme activitiese0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
Doradoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 15 sorghum variety showed high enzyme activities when compared to Dorado variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2400–2485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Positive control had the lowest activities of tested enzymes.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
activities of the tested enzymese0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The positive control recorded the lowest values of the activities of the tested enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2487–2574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–36 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with the positive control, comparable results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–1906 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · SorghumPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.