Abstract
Abstract Saki, A.A., Nik-Khah, A. and Nourusiyan, H. 1997. Urea treatment of temperate cereal straws for sheep in Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 12: 177–186. The nutritive value of straws from different varieties of wheat, barley and triticale, treated (5% urea) or untreated was assessed in vivo in sheep. Urea treatment reduced dry matter (DM) and crude fibre (CF) contents but increased crude protein (CP) and mineral contents. Nutrient digestibility was also increased. The voluntary intake of dry matter of the straws was also measured. There was significant increase (P>0.01) in nutritive value of treated straws but there were no significant differences among straws from different species. The voluntary intake of the straws followed the same trend.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Urea treatment reduced dry matter and crude fibre contents of wheat, barley and triticale straws relative to untreated straws.
- Taxon
- wheat, barley and triticale
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivum
×Triticosecalee0 - Treatment
- Urea treatmente1
- Outcome
- dry matter (DM) and crude fibre (CF) contentse1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- untreatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The nutritive value of straws from different varieties of wheat, barley and triticale, treated (5% urea) or untreated was assessed in vivo in sheep”
e1“Urea treatment reduced dry matter (DM) and crude fibre (CF) contents but increased crude protein (CP) and mineral contents”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea treatment increased crude protein and mineral contents of wheat, barley and triticale straws relative to untreated straws.
- Taxon
- wheat, barley and triticaleHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- Urea treatmente1
- Outcome
- crude protein (CP) and mineral contentse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- untreatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutritive value of straws from different varieties of wheat, barley and triticale, treated (5% urea) or untreated was assessed in vivo in sheep”
e1“Urea treatment reduced dry matter (DM) and crude fibre (CF) contents but increased crude protein (CP) and mineral contents”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea treatment increased nutrient digestibility of the straws.
- Taxon
- wheat, barley and triticaleHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- 5% ureae0
- Outcome
- Nutrient digestibilitye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Comparator
- untreatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutritive value of straws from different varieties of wheat, barley and triticale, treated (5% urea) or untreated was assessed in vivo in sheep”
e2“Nutrient digestibility was also increased”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea treatment significantly increased the nutritive value of the straws.
- Taxon
- wheat, barley and triticaleHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee0
- Treatment
- 5% ureae0
- Outcome
- nutritive valuee3
- Direction
- increasee3
- Qualifier
- P>0.01e3
- Comparator
- untreatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutritive value of straws from different varieties of wheat, barley and triticale, treated (5% urea) or untreated was assessed in vivo in sheep”
e3“There was significant increase (P>0.01) in nutritive value of treated straws but there were no significant differences among straws from different species”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences in nutritive value were found among straws from different species.
- Taxon
- wheat, barley and triticaleHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee0
- Outcome
- nutritive valuee3
- Qualifier
- straws from different speciese3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutritive value of straws from different varieties of wheat, barley and triticale, treated (5% urea) or untreated was assessed in vivo in sheep”
e3“There was significant increase (P>0.01) in nutritive value of treated straws but there were no significant differences among straws from different species”
Claim · model-written summary
Voluntary intake of the straws followed the same trend as their nutritive value.
- Taxon
- wheat, barley and triticaleHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee0
- Outcome
- voluntary intake of the strawse4
- Qualifier
- followed the same trende4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The nutritive value of straws from different varieties of wheat, barley and triticale, treated (5% urea) or untreated was assessed in vivo in sheep”
e4“The voluntary intake of the straws followed the same trend”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
92 papers more in this group
See all 96 papers →nitrogen · quality: grain · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nitrogen · quality: grain · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
68 papers more in this group
See all 72 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
450 papers more in this group
See all 454 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.