Paper · 2010 · Genetika

Effect of nitrogen and ecological factors on quality of winter triticale cultivars

Veselinka Zecevic; Desimir Knezevic; Jelena Boskovic; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
26
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons of (2004/05, 2005/06 and 2006/07) to investigate the effect of various nitrogen doses on quality components of two winter triticale cultivars (Favorit and Trijumf). Nitrogen fertilizers are applied in four doses: N1= 60 kg N ha-1, N2= 90 kg N ha-1 and N3= 120 kg N ha-1. Analysis of sedimentation, gluten content, and rheological flour and dough properties were done. The results showed that N fertilization significantly increased investigated quality traits in both cultivars. The highest sedimentation value and gluten content established with application of 120 kg N ha-1. Triticale cultivars reacted positively to nitrogen increasing, and its rheological flour and dough properties increased with N increasing. Nevertheless, quality of investigated cultivars belonged to C2 quality group. By the analysis of variance established high significant differences in mean values of sedimentation, wet gluten content and water absorption among the cultivars (A), years (B) and supplied nitrogen doses (C). All interactions (AB, AC, BC and ABC) were significant for wet gluten content, but for sedimentation only interaction, while of water absorption was only significant interaction BC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization significantly increased the quality traits of both triticale cultivars.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Material
Favorit and Trijumfe0
Treatment
N fertilizatione1
Outcome
investigated quality traitse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Field experimentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“two winter triticale cultivars (Favorit and Trijumf)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that N fertilization significantly increased investigated quality traits in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–539 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted during three growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sedimentation value and gluten content were obtained with 120 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
120 kg N ha-1e3
Outcome
sedimentation value and gluten contente3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest sedimentation value and gluten content established with application of 120 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale cultivars reacted positively to increasing nitrogen.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
nitrogen increasinge4
Outcome
reactede4
Direction
positivelye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“Triticale cultivars reacted positively to nitrogen increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rheological flour and dough properties increased with increasing nitrogen.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
N increasinge5
Outcome
rheological flour and dough propertiese5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“its rheological flour and dough properties increased with N increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quality of the investigated cultivars belonged to the C2 quality group.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Outcome
quality of investigated cultivarse6
Value
C2e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nevertheless, quality of investigated cultivars belonged to C2 quality group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–854 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ANOVA showed significant differences in sedimentation, wet gluten content and water absorption among cultivars, years and nitrogen doses.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
supplied nitrogen dosese7
Outcome
mean values of sedimentation, wet gluten content and water absorptione7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“By the analysis of variance established high significant differences in mean values of sedimentation, wet gluten content and water absorption among the cultivars (A), years (B) and supplied nitrogen doses (C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1064 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All interactions among cultivar, year and nitrogen dose were significant for wet gluten content.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
AB, AC, BC and ABCe7
Outcome
wet gluten contente7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“All interactions (AB, AC, BC and ABC) were significant for wet gluten content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only one interaction was significant for sedimentation.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
only interactione7
Outcome
sedimentatione7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“but for sedimentation only interaction, while of water absorption was only significant interaction BC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1246 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the BC interaction was significant for water absorption.

Taxon
winter triticale×Triticosecalet0
Treatment
interaction BCe7
Outcome
water absorptione7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter triticale cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“but for sedimentation only interaction, while of water absorption was only significant interaction BC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1246 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.