Paper · 2016 · Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

Effect of spent mushroom compost on yield and fruit quality of tomato

Reema Ashrafi; Md Rashedur Rahman Rajib; Rajia Sultana; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to observe the performance of the composted spent mushroom substrate (SMS) along with chemical fertilizers on the yield, fruit quality and nutrient uptake by tomato plant for using the mushroom waste through composting. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with seven replications. Treatments were T1: no fertilizer and compost application (control), T2: recommended dose of fertilizers (RFD), T3: 25% SMC-N+ 75% fertilizer-N, T4: RFD + 2.5 t ha-1 SMC, T5: 50% SMC-N + 50% fertilizer-N, T6: 100% SMC-N and T7: 100% SMC-N + 50% fertilizer-N. Application of SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dose showed the best performance for number of fruits, fruit yield, fruit quality (total protein, vitamin C, total sugar, reducing sugar) and nutrient uptake by tomato. This treatment showed significantly higher fruit yield, quality and nutrient uptake not only over control but also RFD, SMS compost alone and combination of SMS compost & RFD. Though SMS compost alone proved less effective, however combined application of SMS compost at 2.5 tha-1 with chemical fertilizer of recommended dose had shown to be more effective.Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. December 2015, 1(3): 471-477

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with recommended fertilizer gave the best number of tomato fruits.

Treatment
SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dosee0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dose showed the best performance for number of fruits, fruit yield, fruit quality (total protein, vitamin C, total sugar, reducing sugar) and nutrient uptake by tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with recommended fertilizer produced significantly higher tomato fruit yield than listed alternatives.

Treatment
SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dosee1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment showed significantly higher fruit yield, quality and nutrient uptake not only over control but also RFD, SMS compost alone and combination of SMS compost & RFD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dose showed the best performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly improved tomato fruit quality over control and other fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dosee1
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment showed significantly higher fruit yield, quality and nutrient uptake not only over control but also RFD, SMS compost alone and combination of SMS compost & RFD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dose showed the best performance for number of fruits, fruit yield, fruit quality (total protein, vitamin C, total sugar, reducing sugar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly increased tomato nutrient uptake over control and other fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dosee1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment showed significantly higher fruit yield, quality and nutrient uptake not only over control but also RFD, SMS compost alone and combination of SMS compost & RFD.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of SMS compost at 2.5 t ha-1 along with recommended fertilizer dose showed the best performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS compost alone was less effective.

Treatment
SMS compost alonee0
Outcome
less effectivee0
Direction
less effectivee0
Comparator
combined application of SMS compost at 2.5 tha-1 with chemical fertilizer of recommended dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Though SMS compost alone proved less effective, however combined application of SMS compost at 2.5 tha-1 with chemical fertilizer of recommended dose had shown to be more effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

growing medium · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 34 positive, 7 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 94 positive, 22 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.