Paper · 2018 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Cherry tomato production on different organic substrates under protected environment conditions

Edilson Costa; Flávio Ferreira da Silva Binotti; Eliana Duarte Cardoso; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme) is gaining importance as an alternative crop, mainly for small farms that use family hand labor and organic management. In this study, we investigated the effects of organic substrate combinations of cattle manure (M), vermicompost (VC), and vermiculite (V) on the yield and quality of cherry tomato fruits. Cherry tomato plants of the cultivar Carolina were grown under greenhouse conditions in 5-L pots. The five investigated substrate combinations were as follows: (T1) 80% M + 10% VC + 10% V; (T2) 70% M + 15% VC + 15% V; (T3) 60% M + 20% VC + 20% V; (T4) 50% M + 25% VC + 25% V; and (T5) 40% M + 30% VC + 30% V. Plant growth, tomato yield, and physicochemical properties of the fruits were measured. The results showed that combinations of 50% M + 25% VC + 25% V and 40% M + 30% VC + 30% V led to the best growth and adaptation of cherry tomato plants, resulting in larger and more rounded fruits. The substrate containing 40% M + 30% VC + 30% V resulted in higher numbers of fruits per plant. Different substrate combinations did not affect the chemical quality of the fruit. Therefore, our study has provided valuable information on the use of organic substrates in cherry tomato production under protected environment conditions. Based on our results, the different combinations of cattle manure, vermicompost, and vermiculite used in this study represent excellent options for reducing production costs and re-using organic byproducts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% manure mixture gave among the best growth and adaptation, with larger and more rounded fruits.

Treatment
50% M + 25% VC + 25% Ve0
Outcome
best growth and adaptation of cherry tomato plants, resulting in larger and more rounded fruitse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combinations of 50% M + 25% VC + 25% V and 40% M + 30% VC + 30% V led to the best growth and adaptation of cherry tomato plants, resulting in larger and more rounded fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40% manure mixture gave among the best growth and adaptation, with larger and more rounded fruits.

Treatment
40% M + 30% VC + 30% Ve0
Outcome
best growth and adaptation of cherry tomato plants, resulting in larger and more rounded fruitse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combinations of 50% M + 25% VC + 25% V and 40% M + 30% VC + 30% V led to the best growth and adaptation of cherry tomato plants, resulting in larger and more rounded fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40% manure mixture yielded higher fruit numbers per plant.

Treatment
40% M + 30% VC + 30% Ve0
Outcome
numbers of fruits per plante0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The substrate containing 40% M + 30% VC + 30% V resulted in higher numbers of fruits per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1058 · show in text ↑
e1

“cherry tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different substrate mixtures did not affect fruit chemical quality.

Treatment
Different substrate combinationse0
Outcome
chemical quality of the fruite0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different substrate combinations did not affect the chemical quality of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“cherry tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–367 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider the organic substrate combinations options for reducing production costs and reusing byproducts.

Outcome
reducing production costs and re-using organic byproductse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the different combinations of cattle manure, vermicompost, and vermiculite used in this study represent excellent options for reducing production costs and re-using organic byproducts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1504 · show in text ↑
e1

“cherry tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1258 · show in text ↑

growing medium · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 20 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.