Paper · 2014 · Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences

Improvement of antioxidant and defense properties of Tomato (var. Pusa Rohini) by application of bioaugmented compost

Shikha Verma; Anamika Sharma; Raj Kumar; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Nutrient management practices play a significant role in improving the nutritional quality of tomato. The present study deals with the evaluation of compost prepared using Effective Microorganisms (EM), on antioxidant and defense enzyme activities of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). A field experiment with five treatments (control, chemical fertilizer and EM compost alone and in combination) was conducted in randomized block design. An increment of 31.83% in tomato yield was recorded with the combined use of EM compost and half recommended dose of chemical fertilizers (N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)). Similarly, fruit quality was improved in terms of lycopene content (35.52%), antioxidant activity (24-63%) and defense enzymes activity (11-54%), in tomatoes in this treatment as compared to the application of recommended dose of fertilizers. Soil microbiological parameters also exhibited an increase of 7-31% in the enzyme activities in this treatment. Significant correlation among fruit quality parameters with soil microbiological activities reveals the positive impact of EM compost which may be adopted as an eco-friendly strategy for production of high quality edible products.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined EM compost and half-dose fertilizer increased tomato yield by 31.83%.

Treatment
N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)e0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
incremente0
Value
31.83%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increment of 31.83% in tomato yield was recorded with the combined use of EM compost and half recommended dose of chemical fertilizers (N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased fruit lycopene content by 35.52% versus recommended fertilizer.

Treatment
N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)e2
Outcome
lycopene contente0
Direction
improvede0
Value
35.52%e0
Comparator
application of recommended dose of fertilizerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit quality was improved in terms of lycopene content (35.52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–703 · show in text ↑
e1

“in tomatoes in this treatment as compared to the application of recommended dose of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–869 · show in text ↑
e2

“N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment improved tomato fruit antioxidant activity by 24-63% versus recommended fertilizer.

Treatment
N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)e3
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
improvede1
Value
24-63%e0
Comparator
application of recommended dose of fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant activity (24-63%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–734 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–665 · show in text ↑
e2

“in tomatoes in this treatment as compared to the application of recommended dose of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–869 · show in text ↑
e3

“N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment improved tomato fruit defense enzyme activity by 11-54% versus recommended fertilizer.

Treatment
N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)e3
Outcome
defense enzymes activitye0
Direction
improvede1
Value
11-54%e0
Comparator
application of recommended dose of fertilizerse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“defense enzymes activity (11-54%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality was improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–665 · show in text ↑
e2

“in tomatoes in this treatment as compared to the application of recommended dose of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–869 · show in text ↑
e3

“N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil enzyme activities increased by 7-31% under the combined tomato treatment.

Treatment
N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)e2
Outcome
Soil microbiological parameters also exhibited an increase of 7-31% in the enzyme activitiese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7-31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil microbiological parameters also exhibited an increase of 7-31% in the enzyme activities in this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomatoes in this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–803 · show in text ↑
e2

“N50P30K25 + EM compost at the rate of 5 t ha(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–625 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit quality parameters correlated significantly with soil microbiological activities.

Outcome
fruit quality parameterse0
Qualifier
soil microbiological activitiese0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant correlation among fruit quality parameters with soil microbiological activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“the nutritional quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 67–100 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 51 positive, 3 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.