Abstract
The results showed that seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kg recorded lower infestation of dead heart (7.9%) with less shoot bug population (5.83/5 plant), and higher grain yield (31.93 q/ha) besides, higher fodder yield (56.92 q/ha). Imidacloprid 70 WS @ 5 g/ha, endosulfan 35 EC seed soaking (8 hrs) @ 2 ml/lt/kg and carbosulfan 25 DS @ 40 g/kg were the next best treatments and were on par with each other.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam seed treatment recorded lower dead heart infestation of 7.9%.
- Treatment
- seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kge0
- Interactor
- Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccatat0pest - Outcome
- infestation of dead hearte0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 7.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

_Figure_3.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kg recorded lower infestation of dead heart (7.9%)”
t0“Bio-efficacy of Chemicals for Seed Treatment against Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata and Shoot Bug, Peregrinus maidis”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam seed treatment recorded a lower shoot bug population of 5.83 per five plants.
- Treatment
- seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kge2
- Interactor
- Peregrinus maidis
Peregrinus maidist0pest - Outcome
- shoot bug populatione0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 5.83/5 plante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“less shoot bug population (5.83/5 plant)”
t0“Bio-efficacy of Chemicals for Seed Treatment against Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata and Shoot Bug, Peregrinus maidis”
e2“seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kg recorded lower infestation of dead heart (7.9%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam seed treatment yielded 31.93 q/ha grain, reported as higher.
- Treatment
- seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kge2
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 31.93 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“higher grain yield (31.93 q/ha)”
t0“Bio-efficacy of Chemicals for Seed Treatment against Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata and Shoot Bug, Peregrinus maidis”
e2“seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kg recorded lower infestation of dead heart (7.9%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam seed treatment yielded 56.92 q/ha fodder, reported as higher.
- Treatment
- seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kge2
- Outcome
- fodder yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 56.92 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“higher fodder yield (56.92 q/ha)”
t0“Bio-efficacy of Chemicals for Seed Treatment against Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata and Shoot Bug, Peregrinus maidis”
e2“seed treatment with thiamethoxam 70 WS @ 2 g/kg recorded lower infestation of dead heart (7.9%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid was among the next best treatments and was on par with the others listed.
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid 70 WS @ 5 g/hae0
- Outcome
- next best treatmentse0
- Direction
- on par with each othere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Imidacloprid 70 WS @ 5 g/ha, endosulfan 35 EC seed soaking (8 hrs) @ 2 ml/lt/kg and carbosulfan 25 DS @ 40 g/kg were the next best treatments and were on par with each other”
t0“Bio-efficacy of Chemicals for Seed Treatment against Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata and Shoot Bug, Peregrinus maidis”
Claim · model-written summary
Endosulfan soaking was among the next best treatments and was on par with the others listed.
- Treatment
- endosulfan 35 EC seed soaking (8 hrs) @ 2 ml/lt/kge0
- Outcome
- next best treatmentse0
- Direction
- on par with each othere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“endosulfan 35 EC seed soaking (8 hrs) @ 2 ml/lt/kg and carbosulfan 25 DS @ 40 g/kg were the next best treatments and were on par with each other”
t0“Bio-efficacy of Chemicals for Seed Treatment against Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata and Shoot Bug, Peregrinus maidis”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbosulfan was among the next best treatments and was on par with the others listed.
- Treatment
- carbosulfan 25 DS @ 40 g/kge0
- Outcome
- next best treatmentse0
- Direction
- on par with each othere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“carbosulfan 25 DS @ 40 g/kg were the next best treatments and were on par with each other”
t0“Bio-efficacy of Chemicals for Seed Treatment against Sorghum Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata and Shoot Bug, Peregrinus maidis”
The same questions in other papers
thiamethoxam · Peregrinus maidis · SorghumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
thiamethoxam · Atherigona soccata · SorghumResults agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →thiamethoxam · yield · SorghumResults agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →seed treatment · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →seed treatment · Atherigona soccata · SorghumResults agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.