Paper · 2003 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Seasonal Disease Profile and Chemical Management of Fungal Rot Loss of Citrus Fruits

V. S. Verma; Mohan Tikoo

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The peak penod of fungal rottage loss of lime fruit started from the summer month of May (8.3%), maximum in the month of August (15.1%) and declined thereafter, in October (8.5%). Aspergillus niger was the major contributor (5.1 - 10.8%) of huge rottage loss. However, the maximum spoilage during winter months was due to Penicillium digitatum (1.1–2.7%) and P. italicum (0.6–1.2%) causing green and blue molds of lime fruits, respectively. All the six fungitoxicants were effective against green mold (Penicillium digitatum) responsible for rottage losses of citrus fruits in the post-harvest market chain. However, thiabendazole (0 5%), benlate (0.05%) and bavistin (0.05%) were equally effective against the rot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime fruit rottage was 8.3% in May.

Outcome
lime fruite0
Value
8.3%e0
Setting
Maye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantiifolia
Citrus ×aurantiifolia · TaxonAyuwadala · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lime fruit started from the summer month of May (8.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime fruit rottage reached 15.1% in August.

Taxon
Citrus FruitsCitrust0
Outcome
maximume0
Value
15.1%e0
Setting
Auguste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum in the month of August (15.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–135 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime fruit rottage declined to 8.5% in October.

Taxon
Citrus FruitsCitrust0
Outcome
declinede0
Direction
declinede0
Value
8.5%e0
Setting
Octobere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“declined thereafter, in October (8.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aspergillus niger contributed 5.1–10.8% of rottage loss.

Taxon
Citrus FruitsCitrust0
Interactor
Aspergillus nigerAspergillus nigere0pathogen
Outcome
rottage losse0
Value
5.1 - 10.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aspergillus niger was the major contributor (5.1 - 10.8%) of huge rottage loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–259 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium digitatum caused the most winter green mold spoilage, 1.1–2.7%.

Taxon
lime fruitsCitrus ×aurantiifoliae0
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
greene0
Value
1.1–2.7%e0
Setting
winter monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantiifolia
Citrus ×aurantiifolia · TaxonAyuwadala · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum spoilage during winter months was due to Penicillium digitatum (1.1–2.7%) and P. italicum (0.6–1.2%) causing green and blue molds of lime fruits, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–440 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. italicum caused blue mold spoilage of lime fruits, 0.6–1.2%.

Taxon
lime fruitsCitrus ×aurantiifoliae0
Interactor
P. italicumPenicillium italicume0pathogen
Outcome
blue moldse0
Value
0.6–1.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus x aurantiifolia
Citrus ×aurantiifolia · TaxonAyuwadala · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium italicum
Penicillium italicum · InteractorJean.claude · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. italicum (0.6–1.2%) causing green and blue molds of lime fruits, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six fungitoxicants controlled green mold caused by Penicillium digitatum.

Taxon
citrus fruitsCitruse0
Treatment
six fungitoxicantse0
Interactor
Penicillium digitatumPenicillium digitatume0pathogen
Outcome
green molde0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium digitatum
Penicillium digitatum · InteractorKeith Seifert · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the six fungitoxicants were effective against green mold (Penicillium digitatum) responsible for rottage losses of citrus fruits in the post-harvest market chain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiabendazole at 0 5% was effective against rot.

Taxon
Citrus FruitsCitrust0
Treatment
thiabendazole (0 5%)e0
Outcome
rote0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiabendazole (0 5%), benlate (0.05%) and bavistin (0.05%) were equally effective against the rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benlate at 0.05% was effective against rot.

Taxon
Citrus FruitsCitrust0
Treatment
benlate (0.05%)e0
Outcome
rote0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiabendazole (0 5%), benlate (0.05%) and bavistin (0.05%) were equally effective against the rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bavistin at 0.05% was effective against rot.

Taxon
Citrus FruitsCitrust0
Treatment
bavistin (0.05%)e0
Outcome
rote0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiabendazole (0 5%), benlate (0.05%) and bavistin (0.05%) were equally effective against the rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–84 · show in text ↑

thiabendazole · disease · CitrusPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carbendazim · disease · CitrusResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

benomyl · disease · CitrusResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.