Paper · 1986 · Tropical Agriculture

Response of blackgram, chickpea and mungbean to vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation in an unsterile soil

A. Manjunath; D. J. Bagyaraj

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Response of blackgram, chickpea and mungbean to inoculation with the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum with and without added P (22 kg P ha-1) was studied in a P-deficient unsterile soil. Inoculation with G. fasciculatum increased the dry weight and P content of the shoot and root significantly over the uninoculated control. Application of P did not reduce the percentage root colonization by VA mycorrhizal fungi but increased the number of extramatrical chlamydospores in the soil. P application also increased the dry weight and P content of the inoculated plants, suggesting the need for application of P to obtain maximum benefit from VA mycorrhiza in P-fixing soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased shoot and root dry weight.

Taxon
blackgram, chickpea and mungbeanCicer arietinumVigna mungoVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
shoot and roote0
Treatment
Inoculation with G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with G. fasciculatum increased the dry weight and P content of the shoot and root significantly over the uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram, chickpea and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased shoot and root P content.

Taxon
blackgram, chickpea and mungbeanCicer arietinumVigna mungoVigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
shoot and roote0
Treatment
Inoculation with G. fasciculatume0
Interactor
G. fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse0symbiont
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with G. fasciculatum increased the dry weight and P content of the shoot and root significantly over the uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 193–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram, chickpea and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application did not reduce mycorrhizal root colonization.

Taxon
blackgram, chickpea and mungbeanCicer arietinumVigna mungoVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Application of Pe0
Interactor
VA mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
percentage root colonizatione0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P did not reduce the percentage root colonization by VA mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram, chickpea and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application increased extramatrical fungal chlamydospores in soil.

Taxon
blackgram, chickpea and mungbeanCicer arietinumVigna mungoVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Application of Pe0
Interactor
VA mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
number of extramatrical chlamydospores in the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P did not reduce the percentage root colonization by VA mycorrhizal fungi but increased the number of extramatrical chlamydospores in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram, chickpea and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application increased dry weight of inoculated plants.

Taxon
blackgram, chickpea and mungbeanCicer arietinumVigna mungoVigna radiatat0
Treatment
P applicatione0
Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbionte0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P application also increased the dry weight and P content of the inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram, chickpea and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application increased P content of inoculated plants.

Taxon
blackgram, chickpea and mungbeanCicer arietinumVigna mungoVigna radiatat0
Treatment
P applicatione0
Interactor
Glomus fasciculatumRhizophagus fasciculatuse1symbionte0
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P application also increased the dry weight and P content of the inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram, chickpea and mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus fasciculatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–107 · show in text ↑

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Rhizophagus fasciculatus · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.