Paper · 2011 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Bioremediation of tannery effluent and its impact on seed germination (blackgram and sunflower)

Mythili, K*.; Karthikeyan, B.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, we attempted two investigational systems: one is treatment of tannery effluent by aerobic bacterial consortium and the other is impact of treated and untreated effluent on seed germination. For the effluent treatment, heavy metal resistant bacteria were isolated from tannery effluent. Among them, Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Micrococcus were selected for the further studies. The selected isolates were tested for their efficiency on the bioremediation of tannery effluent. The physico-chemical properties such as colour, odour, pH, electrical conductivity, total solids, suspended solids, dissolved solids, BOD, COD, chromium, zinc, iron, nickel were found decreased in effluent after 72 hrs. The study of seed germination (Blackgram and Sunflower) was carried out at 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100% concentrations of treated and untreated effluent using soil sowing method. Shoot length, fresh weight, dry weight and chlorophyll content showed an increase when treated effluent was tested whereas a decrease of growth was noticed in untreated effluent tested seedlings. The results revealed that effluent treated by aerobic microorganisms has no negative impact on the seed germination and can be effectively used for irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated effluent increased shoot length, fresh weight, and dry weight in blackgram and sunflower seedlings.

Taxon
Blackgram and SunflowerVigna mungoHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
treated effluente0
Outcome
Shoot length, fresh weight, dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated effluente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length, fresh weight, dry weight and chlorophyll content showed an increase when treated effluent was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackgram and Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–762 · show in text ↑
e2

“concentrations of treated and untreated effluent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated effluent increased chlorophyll content in the seedlings.

Taxon
Blackgram and SunflowerVigna mungoHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
treated effluente0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
untreated effluente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content showed an increase when treated effluent was tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–996 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackgram and Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–762 · show in text ↑
e2

“concentrations of treated and untreated effluent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated effluent decreased seedling growth.

Taxon
Blackgram and SunflowerVigna mungoHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
untreated effluente0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
treated effluente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease of growth was noticed in untreated effluent tested seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackgram and Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–762 · show in text ↑
e2

“concentrations of treated and untreated effluent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that microbially treated effluent does not harm seed germination.

Taxon
Blackgram and SunflowerVigna mungoHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
effluent treated by aerobic microorganismse0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
no negative impacte0
Comparator
untreated effluente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effluent treated by aerobic microorganisms has no negative impact on the seed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackgram and Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–762 · show in text ↑
e2

“concentrations of treated and untreated effluent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–855 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend microbially treated effluent for irrigation.

Taxon
Blackgram and SunflowerVigna mungoHelianthus annuuse1
Outcome
can be effectively used for irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effluent treated by aerobic microorganisms has no negative impact on the seed germination and can be effectively used for irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1236 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackgram and Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–762 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

inoculation · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 54 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.