Paper · 2020 · Planta Daninha

Non-Chemical Control of Charcoal Rot of Urdbean by Sonchus oleraceous Application

S. BANARAS; A. JAVAID; A. SHOAIB

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is an important leguminous crop whose production is severely affected by charcoal rot disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. This study was undertaken to seek an environmental friendly alternative to synthetic fungicides for management of this disease. Dry biomass of an allelopathic weed Sonchus oleraceous L. was used to combat the menace. Fumigated sandy loam pot soil, pre-inoculated with M. phaseolina, was amended with different doses of dry biomass of the weed ranging from 0.5% to 3%. Application of 2% weed biomass completely controlled the disease. Soil inoculation with M. phaseolina inoculation (positive control) reduced shoot dry weight and grain yield of urdbean by 59% and 91%, respectively, over negative control. Application of different doses of soil amendment in pathogen inoculated soil enhanced shoot dry weight and grain yield of urdbean by 107-307% and 438-7400%, respectively, over positive control. The highest positive effect on growth and yield of uedbean in M. phaseolina contaminated soil was recorded due to 2.5% amendment. M. phaseolina inoculation significantly enhanced peroxidase (POX) and phenyl alanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activities. However, application of different doses of S. oleraceous biomass to the soil gradually decreased activities of these enzymes. The present study concludes that application of 2.5% dry biomass of S. oleraceous can completely control charcoal rot of urdbean and significantly enhance crop growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 2% Sonchus oleraceus weed biomass completely controlled charcoal rot of urdbean.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungoe0
Treatment
2% weed biomasse1
Interactor
Macrophomina phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
charcoal rot diseasee0
Direction
completely controllede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is an important leguminous crop whose production is severely affected by charcoal rot disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–171 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 2% weed biomass completely controlled the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina reduced urdbean shoot dry weight by 59% relative to the negative control.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe2
Treatment
Soil inoculation with M. phaseolinae2
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae2pathogen
Outcome
shoot dry weighte2
Direction
reducede2
Value
59%e2
Comparator
negative controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Soil inoculation with M. phaseolina inoculation (positive control) reduced shoot dry weight and grain yield of urdbean by 59% and 91%, respectively, over negative control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina reduced urdbean grain yield by 91% relative to the negative control.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe2
Treatment
Soil inoculation with M. phaseolinae2
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae2pathogen
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
reducede2
Value
91%e2
Comparator
negative controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Soil inoculation with M. phaseolina inoculation (positive control) reduced shoot dry weight and grain yield of urdbean by 59% and 91%, respectively, over negative control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment enhanced urdbean shoot dry weight by 107-307% over the positive control in pathogen-inoculated soil.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe3
Treatment
soil amendmente3
Outcome
shoot dry weighte3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
107-307%e3
Comparator
positive controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Application of different doses of soil amendment in pathogen inoculated soil enhanced shoot dry weight and grain yield of urdbean by 107-307% and 438-7400%, respectively, over positive control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment enhanced urdbean grain yield by 438-7400% over the positive control in pathogen-inoculated soil.

Taxon
urdbeanVigna mungoe3
Treatment
soil amendmente3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
438-7400%e3
Comparator
positive controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Application of different doses of soil amendment in pathogen inoculated soil enhanced shoot dry weight and grain yield of urdbean by 107-307% and 438-7400%, respectively, over positive control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest positive effect on urdbean growth and yield in Macrophomina-contaminated soil was obtained with 2.5% amendment.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungoe0
Treatment
2.5% amendmente4
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae4pathogen
Outcome
growth and yielde4
Direction
highest positive effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is an important leguminous crop whose production is severely affected by charcoal rot disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–171 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest positive effect on growth and yield of uedbean in M. phaseolina contaminated soil was recorded due to 2.5% amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Macrophomina phaseolina inoculation significantly enhanced peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities in urdbean.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungoe0
Treatment
M. phaseolina inoculatione5
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae5pathogen
Outcome
peroxidase (POX) and phenyl alanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activitiese5
Direction
enhancede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is an important leguminous crop whose production is severely affected by charcoal rot disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–171 · show in text ↑
e5

“M. phaseolina inoculation significantly enhanced peroxidase (POX) and phenyl alanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry biomass of Sonchus oleraceus applied to soil decreased the activities of peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase in urdbean.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungoe0
Treatment
different doses of S. oleraceous biomasse6
Outcome
activities of these enzymese6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Urdbean [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is an important leguminous crop whose production is severely affected by charcoal rot disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–171 · show in text ↑
e6

“application of different doses of S. oleraceous biomass to the soil gradually decreased activities of these enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1344 · show in text ↑

Macrophomina phaseolina · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

other · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

other · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.