Abstract
Changes in soil nutrients and biomass production of two willow clones (Salix miyabeana - SX64 and S. purpurea - 9882-34) in a 150 and 200 kg available N ha-1 of urea commercial fertilizer (CF), biosolid compost (BC) and digested dairy manure (DM) and a control (CTO) were compared at Middlebury, VT (MID), Delhi, NY (DEL) and Fredonia, NY (FRE). There was no significant difference in biomass production among the fertilization treatments. First rotation biomass production of SX64 ranged from 13.2-19.0 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at DEL, 9.0-15.0 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at MID and 5.5-9.3 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at FRE. For 9882-34, biomass production ranged from 9.0-11.6 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at DEL, 3.4-8.8 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at MID and 3.5-7.7 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at FRE. This indicates that willow biomass can be produced without fertilizer additions. Application of BC significantly increased soil N, P, Mg and OM levels at the MID site. At the DEL site, BC and DM treatments increased soil N, P, Ca, Mg and OM levels. The fertilization treatments had no significant effect on any soil nutrients at the FRE site.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Willow biomass production did not differ significantly among fertilization treatments.
SalixNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no significant difference in biomass production among the fertilization treatments”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
Claim · model-written summary
First rotation SX64 biomass production ranged from 13.2-19.0 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at DEL.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“First rotation biomass production of SX64 ranged from 13.2-19.0 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at DEL”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
Claim · model-written summary
First rotation SX64 biomass production ranged from 9.0-15.0 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at MID.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“9.0-15.0 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at MID”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
t1“Changes in soil nutrients and biomass production of two willow clones (Salix miyabeana - SX64 and S. purpurea - 9882-34)”
Claim · model-written summary
First rotation SX64 biomass production ranged from 5.5-9.3 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at FRE.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5.5-9.3 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at FRE”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
t1“Changes in soil nutrients and biomass production of two willow clones (Salix miyabeana - SX64 and S. purpurea - 9882-34)”
Claim · model-written summary
First rotation 9882-34 biomass production ranged from 9.0-11.6 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at DEL.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For 9882-34, biomass production ranged from 9.0-11.6 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at DEL”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
Claim · model-written summary
First rotation 9882-34 biomass production ranged from 3.4-8.8 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at MID.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“3.4-8.8 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at MID”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
t1“Changes in soil nutrients and biomass production of two willow clones (Salix miyabeana - SX64 and S. purpurea - 9882-34)”
Claim · model-written summary
First rotation 9882-34 biomass production ranged from 3.5-7.7 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at FRE.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“3.5-7.7 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at FRE”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
t1“Changes in soil nutrients and biomass production of two willow clones (Salix miyabeana - SX64 and S. purpurea - 9882-34)”
Claim · model-written summary
Biosolid compost significantly increased soil N, P, Mg and OM levels at MID.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of BC significantly increased soil N, P, Mg and OM levels at the MID site”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
Claim · model-written summary
BC and DM increased soil N, P, Ca, Mg and OM levels at DEL.
- Treatment
- BC and DM treatmentse0
- Outcome
- soil N, P, Ca, Mg and OM levelse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- DELe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the DEL site, BC and DM treatments increased soil N, P, Ca, Mg and OM levels”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization treatments had no significant effect on soil nutrients at FRE.
- Treatment
- fertilization treatmentse0
- Outcome
- soil nutrientse0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
- Setting
- FREe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fertilization treatments had no significant effect on any soil nutrients at the FRE site”
t0“Soil nutrient dynamics and biomass production in an organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow coppice system”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · Salix (willows)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Salix (willows)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.