Paper · 2002 · Pesticide Research Journal

Efficacy of Different Insecticides and Trichogramma chilonis Ishii in Managing Rice Leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee

Sunil Sehrawat; Roshan Lal; K. K. Dahiya

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seven treatment viz., cartap hydrochloride 4G, monocrotophos 36 SL, Bacillus thuringiensis vaf. Kurstaki, endosulfan 35EC, neem 300 ppm (azadirachtin), ethofenprox 10EC and innundative release of egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishii were evaluated against rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee under field conditions during Kharif 1999. Cartap hydrochloride 4G @ 0.75 kg a.i. ha−1 proved the most effective insecticide in reducing leaffolder's infestation and realizing maximum grain yield, 21.7% increase over untreated control. This was followed by an insecticidal schedule of cartap hydrochloride and monocrotophos 36SL @ 0.5 kg a.i 8 ha−1 resulting in 16.97% increase in yield. Neem, biopesticide (Bt.) and biocontrol agent also played a significant role in mitigating the leaf folder's damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cartap hydrochloride 4G was the most effective insecticide in reducing leaffolder infestation of rice.

Treatment
Cartap hydrochloride 4G @ 0.75 kg a.i. ha−1e1
Interactor
Cnaphalocrocis medinalis GueneeCnaphalocrocis medinalise0pest
Outcome
leaffolder's infestatione1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cnaphalocrocis medinalis
Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · InteractorQuartl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“against rice leaffolder, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis Guenee under field conditions during Kharif 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–352 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cartap hydrochloride 4G @ 0.75 kg a.i. ha−1 proved the most effective insecticide in reducing leaffolder's infestation and realizing maximum grain yield, 21.7% increase over untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cartap hydrochloride 4G at 0.75 kg a.i. ha−1 increased rice grain yield by 21.7% over the untreated control.

Treatment
Cartap hydrochloride 4G @ 0.75 kg a.i. ha−1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
21.7%e1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cartap hydrochloride 4G @ 0.75 kg a.i. ha−1 proved the most effective insecticide in reducing leaffolder's infestation and realizing maximum grain yield, 21.7% increase over untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cartap hydrochloride with monocrotophos 36SL at 0.5 kg a.i. ha−1 increased rice yield by 16.97%.

Treatment
cartap hydrochloride and monocrotophos 36SL @ 0.5 kg a.i 8 ha−1e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasee2
Value
16.97%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
e2

“an insecticidal schedule of cartap hydrochloride and monocrotophos 36SL @ 0.5 kg a.i 8 ha−1 resulting in 16.97% increase in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem significantly mitigated leaf folder damage in rice.

Treatment
Neeme3
Interactor
leaf foldere3pest
Outcome
leaf folder's damagee3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Neem, biopesticide (Bt.) and biocontrol agent also played a significant role in mitigating the leaf folder's damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopesticide (Bt.) significantly mitigated leaf folder damage in rice.

Treatment
biopesticide (Bt.)e3
Interactor
leaf foldere3pest
Outcome
leaf folder's damagee3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Neem, biopesticide (Bt.) and biocontrol agent also played a significant role in mitigating the leaf folder's damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The biocontrol agent Trichogramma chilonis significantly mitigated leaf folder damage in rice.

Treatment
biocontrol agente3
Interactor
leaf foldere3pest
Second interactor
Trichogramma chilonis IshiiTrichogramma chilonise4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaf folder's damagee3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichogramma chilonis
Trichogramma chilonis · Second interactorLin et al. (2023) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Neem, biopesticide (Bt.) and biocontrol agent also played a significant role in mitigating the leaf folder's damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–814 · show in text ↑
e4

“innundative release of egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishii”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–238 · show in text ↑

monocrotophos · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

cartap · Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

hydrochloride · Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

hydrochloride · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cartap · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

biocontrol · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

transgenic · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 10 positive, 7 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

botanical · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 78 positive, 8 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.