Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Evaluation of aqueous botanical extracts and bio-agents against biotic stresses in paddy

Raju Mrb; Visalakshmi; Ramanamurthy KV

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted during kharif 2011-12 and 2012-13 to study the efficacy of locally available weed plant species (Datura stromanium, Calotropis gigantean, Nerium indicum and Azadirachta indica) and bio-agents (Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens) against major pests (stem borer, gall midge and leaf folder) and diseases (sheath blight, sheath rot, leaf spots and false smut) prevalent in north coastal zone of Andhra Pradesh. Among the treatments, soil application of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 2 kg/ac was found most effective in managing sheath blight incidence and promoting growth. Aqueous neem leaf extract @ 5 ml per liter was found statistically superior in managing stem borer incidence. However, none of the aqueous leaf extracts were found effective in minimizing false smut, gall midge and leaf folder. Soil application of P. fluorescens was the most effective recording 4624 kg/ha yield as against 4919 kg/ha in chemical treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Pseudomonas fluorescens was most effective against sheath blight.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
soil application of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 2 kg/ace0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
sheath blight incidencee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 2 kg/ac was found most effective in managing sheath blight incidence and promoting growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Pseudomonas fluorescens most effectively promoted plant growth.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
soil application of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 2 kg/ace0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of Pseudomonas fluorescens @ 2 kg/ac was found most effective in managing sheath blight incidence and promoting growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem leaf extract was statistically superior against stem borer.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
Aqueous neem leaf extract @ 5 ml per litere0
Interactor
stem borere0pest
Outcome
stem borer incidencee0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Aqueous neem leaf extract @ 5 ml per liter was found statistically superior in managing stem borer incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous leaf extracts did not effectively minimize false smut.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
aqueous leaf extractse0
Interactor
false smute0pathogen
Outcome
false smute0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“none of the aqueous leaf extracts were found effective in minimizing false smut, gall midge and leaf folder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous leaf extracts did not effectively minimize gall midge.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
aqueous leaf extractse0
Interactor
gall midgee0pest
Outcome
gall midgee0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“none of the aqueous leaf extracts were found effective in minimizing false smut, gall midge and leaf folder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous leaf extracts did not effectively minimize leaf folder.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
aqueous leaf extractse0
Interactor
leaf foldere0pest
Outcome
leaf foldere0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“none of the aqueous leaf extracts were found effective in minimizing false smut, gall midge and leaf folder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas application produced 4624 kg/ha yield versus 4919 kg/ha under chemical treatment.

Taxon
paddyt0
Treatment
Soil application of P. fluorescense0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lowerinferrede0
Value
4624 kg/hae0
Qualifier
4919 kg/hae0
Comparator
chemical treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of P. fluorescens was the most effective recording 4624 kg/ha yield as against 4919 kg/ha in chemical treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Azadirachta indica · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

phosphorus · Pseudomonas fluorescens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 74 positive, 8 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

botanical · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 78 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

application · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 155 positive, 16 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

application · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

313 papers: 274 positive, 39 negative or no effect

273 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

309 papers more in this group

See all 313 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.