Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of tillage and tank-mix herbicide application on weed management in soybean (Glycine max)

MASOUMEH YOUNESABADI; T.K. DAS; A.R. SHARMA

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute during 2010 and 2011 to investi- gate the effect of tillage and tank-mix herbicide application on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and protein content of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. It was observed that conventional (CT) and no (NT) tillage systems resulted in comparable weed density and dry weight and soybean seed yield during both years except 2010, when NT re- sulted in significantly lower weed density. Tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha was next to weed-free check and superior to all other weed control treatments on the re- duction of weed density in both years, but, with respect to reduction in weed dry weight, it was comparable with pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + hand weeding, which resulted in the lowest weed dry weight after weed-free check. Ni- trogen, P and K uptake by soybean seed was comparably higher in weed-free check and tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha in both years. Conversely, N, P and K uptake by weed was significantly higher in weedy check, and the lowest amount of these nutrients after weed-free check was observed in pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha. All weed control measures resulted in signifi- cantly higher soybean seed yield compared to weedy check, but the tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha resulted in considerably higher seed yield over others in both years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and no tillage had comparable weed density and dry weight in both years, except weed density in 2010.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
no (NT) tillagee0
Outcome
weed density and dry weighte0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
conventional (CT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional (CT) and no (NT) tillage systems resulted in comparable weed density and dry weight and soybean seed yield during both years except 2010, when NT re- sulted in significantly lower weed density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional and no tillage produced comparable soybean seed yield in both years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
no (NT) tillagee0
Outcome
soybean seed yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
conventional (CT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional (CT) and no (NT) tillage systems resulted in comparable weed density and dry weight and soybean seed yield during both years except 2010, when NT re- sulted in significantly lower weed density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage lowered weed density significantly in 2010.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when NT re- sulted in significantly lower weed density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus imazethapyr was second only to weed-free management in reducing weed density and exceeded other treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/hae0
Outcome
re- duction of weed densitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
weed-free checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha was next to weed-free check and superior to all other weed control treatments on the re- duction of weed density in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix and pendimethalin plus hand weeding were comparable for reducing weed dry weight.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/hae1
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + hand weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with respect to reduction in weed dry weight, it was comparable with pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin plus hand weeding gave the lowest weed dry weight after weed-free management.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + hand weedinge0
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
weed-free checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + hand weeding, which resulted in the lowest weed dry weight after weed-free check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seed N, P and K uptake was comparably higher with weed-free management.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
weed-free checke0
Outcome
Ni- trogen, P and K uptake by soybean seede0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ni- trogen, P and K uptake by soybean seed was comparably higher in weed-free check and tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seed N, P and K uptake was comparably higher with the tank mix.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/hae0
Outcome
Ni- trogen, P and K uptake by soybean seede0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ni- trogen, P and K uptake by soybean seed was comparably higher in weed-free check and tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1085 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds took up significantly more N, P and K in the weedy check.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
weedy checke0
Outcome
N, P and K uptake by weede0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, P and K uptake by weed was significantly higher in weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After weed-free management, tank mix gave the lowest weed N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/hae0
Outcome
amount of these nutrientse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
weed-free checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest amount of these nutrients after weed-free check was observed in pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Every weed-control treatment raised soybean seed yield significantly relative to the weedy check.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
All weed control measurese0
Outcome
soybean seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All weed control measures resulted in signifi- cantly higher soybean seed yield compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix produced considerably higher soybean seed yield than other treatments in both years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/hae0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tank-mix pre-emergence application of pendimethalin 0.5 kg/ha + imazethapyr 0.075 kg/ha resulted in considerably higher seed yield over others in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1565 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–82 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

47 papers: 37 positive, 10 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

85 papers: 66 positive, 19 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Imazethapyr · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 44 positive, 6 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Imazethapyr · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 64 positive, 4 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

pendimethalin · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

tillage · weed · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 25 positive, 19 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.