Paper · 2008 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Bunch Shading During Different Developmental Stages Affects the Phenolic Biosynthesis in Berry Skins of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ Grapes

Kazuya Koyama; Nami Goto-Yamamoto

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
132
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of bunch shading during early development (before the onset of ripening) and/or during ripening on the phenolic composition of grape skins ( Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) as well as on the mRNA levels of the biosynthetic genes on the flavonoid pathway was examined. Shading during early development resulted in decreased proanthocyanidin (PA) concentrations. The PA concentrations decreased during ripening, and the decrease of the concentrations was lower in berries shaded during early development than that in the exposed berries. Thus, no significant effect of shading during early development was observed at harvest. Shading during ripening did not influence this decline in the PAs. On the other hand, shading during early development induced changes in the composition such as a decrease of the trihydroxylated subunits within PAs, which agreed with the relative decrease of VvF3 ′ 5 ′ H expression. The anthocyanin concentrations were remarkably reduced when the bunches were shaded during ripening, which was in accordance with the decreased transcription of several anthocyanin biosynthetic genes and transcriptional factors. Shading during early development did not influence the anthocyanin concentrations at harvest; however, it decreased the proportion of trihydroxylated anthocyanins. Thus, shading during early development also had an influence on the compounds biosynthesized during ripening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during early development decreased proanthocyanidin concentrations in berry skins.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
Shading during early developmente2
Outcome
proanthocyanidin (PA) concentrationse2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shading during early development resulted in decreased proanthocyanidin (PA) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decline in PA concentrations during ripening was smaller in berries shaded during early development than in exposed berries.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
shaded during early developmente3
Outcome
decrease of the concentrationse3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
exposed berriese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e3

“the decrease of the concentrations was lower in berries shaded during early development than that in the exposed berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during early development had no significant effect on PA concentrations at harvest.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
shading during early developmente4
Outcome
PA concentrationse5
Direction
no significant effecte4
Qualifier
at harveste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e4

“Thus, no significant effect of shading during early development was observed at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–644 · show in text ↑
e5

“The PA concentrations decreased during ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during ripening did not influence the decline in PA concentrations.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
Shading during ripeninge6
Outcome
decline in the PAse6
Direction
did not influencee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e6

“Shading during ripening did not influence this decline in the PAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during early development decreased the proportion of trihydroxylated subunits within PAs.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
shading during early developmente7
Outcome
trihydroxylated subunits within PAse7
Direction
decreasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e7

“shading during early development induced changes in the composition such as a decrease of the trihydroxylated subunits within PAs, which agreed with the relative decrease of VvF3 ′ 5 ′ H expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–929 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in trihydroxylated PA subunits agreed with a relative decrease in VvF3 ′ 5 ′ H expression under early shading.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
shading during early developmente7
Gene
VvF3 ′ 5 ′ He7
Outcome
VvF3 ′ 5 ′ H expressione7
Direction
relative decreasee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e7

“shading during early development induced changes in the composition such as a decrease of the trihydroxylated subunits within PAs, which agreed with the relative decrease of VvF3 ′ 5 ′ H expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–929 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during ripening remarkably reduced anthocyanin concentrations at harvest.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
shaded during ripeninge2
Outcome
anthocyanin concentrationse2
Direction
remarkably reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“The anthocyanin concentrations were remarkably reduced when the bunches were shaded during ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during ripening decreased transcription of several anthocyanin biosynthetic genes and transcriptional factors.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
shaded during ripeninge2
Gene
anthocyanin biosynthetic genese3
Outcome
transcription of several anthocyanin biosynthetic genes and transcriptional factorse3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“The anthocyanin concentrations were remarkably reduced when the bunches were shaded during ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1030 · show in text ↑
e3

“which was in accordance with the decreased transcription of several anthocyanin biosynthetic genes and transcriptional factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during early development did not influence anthocyanin concentrations at harvest.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
Shading during early developmente2
Outcome
anthocyanin concentrations at harveste2
Direction
did not influencee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shading during early development did not influence the anthocyanin concentrations at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading during early development decreased the proportion of trihydroxylated anthocyanins.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
Shading during early developmente2
Outcome
proportion of trihydroxylated anthocyaninse3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–192 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shading during early development did not influence the anthocyanin concentrations at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1252 · show in text ↑
e3

“however, it decreased the proportion of trihydroxylated anthocyanins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1322 · show in text ↑

shade · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

shade · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.