Paper · 2007 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Effect of Shading on Proanthocyanidin Biosynthesis in the Grape Berry

Akiko Fujita; Noriko Soma; Nami Goto-Yamamoto; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
64
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Proanthocyanidins, which are oligomers and polymers of flavan-3-ol units (e.g., (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin), are important components of grapes for red winemaking. Flavan-3-ols are biosynthesized by the catalysis of anthocyanidin reductase (ANR) and leucoanthocyanidin reductase (LAR). In this study, we investigated the effect of shading on proanthocyanidin biosynthesis in berries of Vitis vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’. Shading of the berries reduced the accumulation of proanthocyanidins and the transcription of ANR and LAR genes in the skins during berry development, while no significant effect was observed in the seeds. Because the proanthocyanidins significantly decreased in the skins and seeds of the control berries during ripening, the levels of proanthocyanidins were similar in the shaded and control berries at the harvest stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced skin proanthocyanidin accumulation during berry development.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
skins during berry developmente0
Treatment
Shading of the berriese0
Outcome
accumulation of proanthocyanidinse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading of the berries reduced the accumulation of proanthocyanidins and the transcription of ANR and LAR genes in the skins during berry development, while no significant effect was observed in the seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading reduced ANR and LAR transcription in berry skins.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
skins during berry developmente0
Treatment
Shading of the berriese0
Gene
ANR and LAR genese0
Outcome
transcription of ANR and LAR genese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading of the berries reduced the accumulation of proanthocyanidins and the transcription of ANR and LAR genes in the skins during berry development, while no significant effect was observed in the seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading had no significant effect in seeds.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
Shadinge0
Outcome
seedse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shading of the berries reduced the accumulation of proanthocyanidins and the transcription of ANR and LAR genes in the skins during berry development, while no significant effect was observed in the seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control skin and seed proanthocyanidins decreased during ripening.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
skins and seedse0
Outcome
proanthocyanidinse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
during ripeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proanthocyanidins significantly decreased in the skins and seeds of the control berries during ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, shaded and control berries had similar proanthocyanidin levels.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Organ / stage
harvest stagee0
Treatment
shadede0
Outcome
levels of proanthocyanidinse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
control berriese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the levels of proanthocyanidins were similar in the shaded and control berries at the harvest stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vitis vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–427 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

shade · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.