Paper · 2006 · Annals of Agricultural Research

STUDIES ON INFLUENCE OF BIOFERTILIZERS AND BIOREGULATORS ON FLOWERING, YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIE

Akath Singh; Jogendra Singh

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiment was conducted to study the response of biofertilizers and bioregulators on strawberry crops. Results indicated that dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3 proved most effective in increasing fruit set, early flowering, yield and also have a significant improvement in fruit quality i.e. berry size, weight and volume. The maximum TTS, total sugar and ascorbic acid content were obtained with the same treatment combination, however, the effect on acidity and TSS/acid ratio was found to be non-significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculation, nitrogen and GA3 treatment improved fruit set.

Taxon
STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIEFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3e0
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3 proved most effective in increasing fruit set, early flowering, yield and also have a significant improvement in fruit quality i.e. berry size, weight and volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculation, nitrogen and GA3 treatment improved early flowering.

Taxon
STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIEFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3e0
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
early floweringe0
Direction
earlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3 proved most effective in increasing fruit set, early flowering, yield and also have a significant improvement in fruit quality i.e. berry size, weight and volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculation, nitrogen and GA3 treatment improved yield.

Taxon
STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIEFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3e0
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3 proved most effective in increasing fruit set, early flowering, yield and also have a significant improvement in fruit quality i.e. berry size, weight and volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined inoculation, nitrogen and GA3 treatment improved berry size, weight and volume.

Taxon
STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIEFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3e0
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
berry size, weight and volumee0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation of Azotobactor and Azospirillum with 60 kg nitrogen/ha in conjunction with 100 ppm GA3 proved most effective in increasing fruit set, early flowering, yield and also have a significant improvement in fruit quality i.e. berry size, weight and volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave maximum TTS, total sugar and ascorbic acid content.

Taxon
STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIEFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
same treatment combinatione0
Outcome
TTS, total sugar and ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum TTS, total sugar and ascorbic acid content were obtained with the same treatment combination, however, the effect on acidity and TSS/acid ratio was found to be non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment effect on acidity and TSS/acid ratio was not significant.

Taxon
STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIEFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
same treatment combinatione0
Outcome
acidity and TSS/acid ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum TTS, total sugar and ascorbic acid content were obtained with the same treatment combination, however, the effect on acidity and TSS/acid ratio was found to be non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“STRAWBERRY CV. SWEET CHARLIE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 38 positive, 1 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Azospirillum · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

60 papers: 48 positive, 12 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

inoculation · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

67 papers: 60 positive, 7 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

nitrogen · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.