Abstract
Satisfactory and sustainable level of agricultural production can be achieved by combined application of inorganic fertilizers with organic manures, bio-fertilizers, bio-regulators and vermicompost. A field experiment was conducted during 2010-12 at experimental farm, Department of Horticulture, Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, Mizoram University, Aizawl, India, to find out the profitability of tissue cultured strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) (cv. Festival) cultivation by using various integrated plant nutrient system (IPNS) combining inorganic fertilizers with organic manures, bio-fertilizers and bio-regulators. The response of IPNS on economics of strawberry indicated that the overall cost of cultivation as well as economics of strawberry production was significantly influenced by integration of various components. Among the different treatments, the highest expenditure of Rupees 2 077 576.83/ha was incurred in 100% RDF + vermicompost as against the lowest in control. With respect to the income, the highest net income of Rupees 7 298 119.27/ha was obtained in 75 % RDF + vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB + 50 ppm GA3+50 ppm BA. The same treatment also recorded the highest cost benefit ratio of 1: 3.51.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Integrated nutrient components significantly affected strawberry cultivation costs and economics.
- Taxon
- strawberry
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Treatment
- integration of various componentse0
- Outcome
- overall cost of cultivation as well as economics of strawberry productione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa)”
e0“the overall cost of cultivation as well as economics of strawberry production was significantly influenced by integration of various components”
Claim · model-written summary
The 100% RDF plus vermicompost treatment incurred the highest expenditure, Rupees 2 077 576.83/ha.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + vermicomposte0
- Outcome
- expendituree0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rupees 2 077 576.83/hae0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa)”
e0“the highest expenditure of Rupees 2 077 576.83/ha was incurred in 100% RDF + vermicompost as against the lowest in control”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RDF combination produced the highest net income, Rupees 7 298 119.27/ha.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- 75 % RDF + vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB + 50 ppm GA3+50 ppm BAe0
- Interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume0symbiont - Outcome
- net incomee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rupees 7 298 119.27/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa)”
e0“the highest net income of Rupees 7 298 119.27/ha was obtained in 75 % RDF + vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB + 50 ppm GA3+50 ppm BA”
Claim · model-written summary
The same 75% RDF combination gave the highest cost benefit ratio, 1: 3.51.
- Taxon
- strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
- Treatment
- 75 % RDF + vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB + 50 ppm GA3+50 ppm BAe0
- Interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 1: 3.51e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa)”
e0“75 % RDF + vermicompost + Azospirillum + PSB + 50 ppm GA3+50 ppm BA”
e1“The same treatment also recorded the highest cost benefit ratio of 1: 3.51”
The same questions in other papers
N-benzyladenine · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Gibberellic acid · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Azospirillum · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results
192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
225 papers more in this group
See all 229 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.