Abstract
Field and pot studies were conducted to determine the compatibility of dicamba in tank mix combination with sulfosulfuron and clodinafop against weeds of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Dicamba alone was effective against broad-leaf weeds only. No significant difference for broad-leaf weed control was observed between dicamba doses of 240 and 360 g/ha. Dicamba in combination with clodinafop and sulfosulfuron controlled the broad spectrum weed flora. The efficacy of dicamba in combination with clodinafop and sulfosulfuron was not affected for broad-leaf weed control. However, Phalaris minor control with clodinafop was reduced when dicamba applied as tank mix combination. The efficacy of sulfosulfuron was not affected by dicamba when applied as tank mixture and as a result this mixture (sulfosulfuron + dicamba 25 + 120 g/ha) had the highest wheat grain yield (4.99 t/ha). P. minor dry weight reduction with clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and in tank mix combination with dicamba 240 g/ha was 97.3 and 58.3%, respectively. In pot studies also, the tank mixing of dicamba did not affect the sulfosulfuron efficacy but clodinafop efficacy was significantly reduced against P. minor. The P. minor biomass reduction with clodinafop 30 and 60 g/ ha was 84.8 and 99.6%, respectively and when dicamba 240 g/ha was added, the fresh weight reduction reduced to 62.6 and 78.6%, respectively, compared to untreated control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba alone controlled broad-leaf weeds only.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Dicamba alonee0
- Interactor
- broad-leaf weedse0weed
- Outcome
- effective against broad-leaf weeds onlye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dicamba alone was effective against broad-leaf weeds only.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Broad-leaf control did not significantly differ between dicamba doses.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- dicamba doses of 240 and 360 g/hae0
- Interactor
- broad-leaf weede0weed
- Outcome
- broad-leaf weed controle0
- Direction
- No significant differencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No significant difference for broad-leaf weed control was observed between dicamba doses of 240 and 360 g/ha.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba with clodinafop controlled broad-spectrum weeds.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Dicamba in combination with clodinafope0
- Interactor
- weed florae0weed
- Outcome
- broad spectrum weed florae0
- Direction
- controllede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dicamba in combination with clodinafop and sulfosulfuron controlled the broad spectrum weed flora.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba with sulfosulfuron controlled broad-spectrum weeds.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Dicamba in combination with clodinafop and sulfosulfurone0
- Interactor
- weed florae0weed
- Outcome
- broad spectrum weed florae0
- Direction
- controllede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dicamba in combination with clodinafop and sulfosulfuron controlled the broad spectrum weed flora.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba reduced clodinafop control of Phalaris minor.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- dicamba applied as tank mix combinatione0
- Interactor
- Phalaris minor
.jpg?width=60)
Phalaris minore0weed - Outcome
- Phalaris minor controle0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- clodinafope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Phalaris minor control with clodinafop was reduced when dicamba applied as tank mix combination.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba did not affect sulfosulfuron efficacy.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- dicambae0
- Outcome
- efficacy of sulfosulfurone0
- Direction
- not affectede0
- Comparator
- sulfosulfurone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The efficacy of sulfosulfuron was not affected by dicamba when applied as tank mixture”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfosulfuron plus dicamba had the highest wheat grain yield of 4.99 t/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- sulfosulfuron + dicamba 25 + 120 g/hae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.99 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this mixture (sulfosulfuron + dicamba 25 + 120 g/ha) had the highest wheat grain yield (4.99 t/ha).”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop alone reduced P. minor dry weight by 97.3%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop 60 g/ha alonee0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- P. minor dry weighte0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 97.3e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P. minor dry weight reduction with clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and in tank mix combination with dicamba 240 g/ha was 97.3 and 58.3%, respectively.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Clodinafop with dicamba reduced P. minor dry weight by 58.3%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- tank mix combination with dicamba 240 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- P. minor dry weighte0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 58.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“P. minor dry weight reduction with clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and in tank mix combination with dicamba 240 g/ha was 97.3 and 58.3%, respectively.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Pot tests also showed dicamba reduced clodinafop efficacy against P. minor.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- tank mixing of dicambae0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- clodinafop efficacye0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- pot studiese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In pot studies also, the tank mixing of dicamba did not affect the sulfosulfuron efficacy but clodinafop efficacy was significantly reduced against P. minor.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Pot clodinafop 30 g/ha reduced P. minor biomass 84.8%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop 30e0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- P. minor biomasse0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 84.8e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The P. minor biomass reduction with clodinafop 30 and 60 g/ ha was 84.8 and 99.6%, respectively”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Pot clodinafop 60 g/ha reduced P. minor biomass 99.6%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafop 30 and 60 g/ hae0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- P. minor biomasse0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 99.6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The P. minor biomass reduction with clodinafop 30 and 60 g/ ha was 84.8 and 99.6%, respectively”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding dicamba reduced P. minor fresh weight 62.6% with lower clodinafop dose.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- dicamba 240 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- fresh weighte0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 62.6e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The P. minor biomass reduction with clodinafop 30 and 60 g/ ha was 84.8 and 99.6%, respectively and when dicamba 240 g/ha was added, the fresh weight reduction reduced to 62.6 and 78.6%, respectively, compared to untreated control.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding dicamba reduced P. minor fresh weight 78.6% with higher clodinafop dose.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- dicamba 240 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
- Outcome
- fresh weighte0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 78.6%e0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The P. minor biomass reduction with clodinafop 30 and 60 g/ ha was 84.8 and 99.6%, respectively and when dicamba 240 g/ha was added, the fresh weight reduction reduced to 62.6 and 78.6%, respectively, compared to untreated control.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
dicamba · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →dicamba · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →dicamba · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.