Paper · 2009 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed dynamics and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) productivity as influenced by planting techniques and weed control practices.

Amandeep Singh Brar; U. S. Walia

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at experimental farm of Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana (India) during rabi seasons of 2004–05 and 2005–06 in a split plot design comprising five planting techniques in main plots (conventional tillage, zero till sowing without stubbles, zero till sowing in standing stubbles, zero till sowing after partial burning and bed planting) and five weed control treatments in sub-plots (clodinafop 60 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/hafb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha, mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/ha and unweeded control). Reduced dry matter of Phalaris minor Retz. and broadleaf weeds and higher wheat grain yield were recorded with zero till sowing in standing stubbles followed by zero till sowing after partial burning and bed planting. Clodinafop 60 g/ha alone controlled P. minor but did not control broadleaf weeds. Significantly reduced population of P. minor as well as broadleaf weeds and increased grain yield of wheat were observed with postemergence application of clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha and mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/ha than clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and control. Among the planting techniques, zero till sowing in standing stubbles and among the weeds control practices sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha recorded highest wheat yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till sowing in standing stubbles reduced Phalaris minor and broadleaf weed dry matter.

Treatment
zero till sowing in standing stubblese0
Interactor
Phalaris minor Retz.Phalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry matter of Phalaris minor Retz. and broadleaf weedse0
Direction
Reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced dry matter of Phalaris minor Retz. and broadleaf weeds and higher wheat grain yield were recorded with zero till sowing in standing stubbles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till sowing in standing stubbles raised wheat grain yield.

Treatment
zero till sowing in standing stubblese0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher wheat grain yield were recorded with zero till sowing in standing stubbles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop alone controlled P. minor.

Treatment
Clodinafop 60 g/hae0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
P. minore0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop 60 g/ha alone controlled P. minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop alone did not control broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
Clodinafop 60 g/hae0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
broadleaf weedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop 60 g/ha alone controlled P. minor but did not control broadleaf weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop followed by 2,4-D significantly reduced P. minor and broadleaf weeds relative to clodinafop alone and control.

Treatment
clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/hae0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
population of P. minor as well as broadleaf weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly reduced population of P. minor as well as broadleaf weeds and increased grain yield of wheat were observed with postemergence application of clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha and mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/ha than clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron significantly reduced P. minor and broadleaf weed populations relative to clodinafop alone and control.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
population of P. minor as well as broadleaf weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly reduced population of P. minor as well as broadleaf weeds and increased grain yield of wheat were observed with postemergence application of clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha and mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/ha than clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron plus iodosulfuron significantly reduced P. minor and broadleaf weed populations relative to clodinafop alone and control.

Treatment
mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/hae0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
population of P. minor as well as broadleaf weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly reduced population of P. minor as well as broadleaf weeds and increased grain yield of wheat were observed with postemergence application of clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha and mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/ha than clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop followed by 2,4-D increased wheat grain yield relative to clodinafop alone and control.

Treatment
clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield of wheat were observed with postemergence application of clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha and mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/ha than clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron increased wheat grain yield relative to clodinafop alone and control.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield of wheat were observed with postemergence application of clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha and mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/ha than clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron plus iodosulfuron increased wheat grain yield relative to clodinafop alone and control.

Treatment
mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield of wheat were observed with postemergence application of clodinafop 60 g/ha fb 2, 4-D 0.5 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha and mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron 12 g/ha than clodinafop 60 g/ha alone and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero till sowing in standing stubbles yielded the most wheat among planting methods.

Treatment
zero till sowing in standing stubblese0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
planting techniquese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the planting techniques, zero till sowing in standing stubbles and among the weeds control practices sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha recorded highest wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron produced the highest wheat yield among weed control practices.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron 25 g/hae0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
weeds control practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the planting techniques, zero till sowing in standing stubbles and among the weeds control practices sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha recorded highest wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1336 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

2,4-D · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

tillage · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Zero till after paraquat yielded significantly more grain than zero till without paraquat and conventional tillage, by 15.8%.

    Weed Control Efficacy of Herbicides in Zero Till Wheat · 2005 · compared with zero till without paraquat spray as well as conventional tillage treatments

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.