Paper · 2009 · Tropical Agricultural Research

Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from unfertilised ovary explants of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.).

P. I. P. Perera; Deepthi Yakandawala; J. L. Verdeil; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Unfertilized ovaries excised from immature female flowers of adult coconut palms (variety Sri Lanka Tall) were cultured in CRI 72 medium supplemented with 100 µM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) for callus induction. Five culture procedures including the standard procedure were tested for induction of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration. In the standard procedure, the calli were transferred to CRI 72 medium with 5 µM abscisic acid (ABA) and high agar concentration (2%) (w/v) for two weeks, CRI 72 medium with 5 µM ABA and normal agar concentration (0.55%) (w/v) for further three weeks, maturation medium (CRI 72 medium without any hormones) for four weeks and germination medium (modified Eeuwens Y 3 medium supplemented with 5 µM 6-benzyl aminopurine (BAP) and 0.1 µM 2,4-D). In the other four procedures, modifications to the standard procedure were done by eliminating certain steps and incorporating 5 µM 2- isopentyl adenine (2iP) into the germination medium. In all five procedures, very poor shoot formation was observed but could be improved by incorporating 0.35 µM gibberelic acid (GA 3 ) into the germination medium. The highest percentage of shoot regeneration (85%) was achieved by sub-culturing the embryogenic calli directly into the modified Eeuwens Y 3 medium devoid of any growth regulators for four weeks followed by sub-culturing into germination medium supplemented with 5 µM 2iP, 0.1 µM 2,4-D and 5 µM BAP and finally to germination medium with 0.35 µM GA 3 . The results clearly indicated the positive effect of 2iP and GA 3 on plant regeneration in ovary-derived calli of coconut.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All five culture procedures yielded very poor shoot formation.

Taxon
coconute1
Organ / stage
ovary-derived callie1
Outcome
very poor shoot formatione0

Verbatim

e0

“In all five procedures, very poor shoot formation was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1048 · show in text ↑
e1

“ovary-derived calli of coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 0.35 µM gibberelic acid to germination medium improved shoot formation.

Taxon
coconute2
Treatment
0.35 µM gibberelic acid (GA 3 )e0
Outcome
shoot formatione1
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“could be improved by incorporating 0.35 µM gibberelic acid (GA 3 ) into the germination medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1147 · show in text ↑
e1

“very poor shoot formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“ovary-derived calli of coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best reported sequence achieved 85% shoot regeneration.

Taxon
coconute1
Treatment
sub-culturing the embryogenic calli directly into the modified Eeuwens Y 3 medium devoid of any growth regulators for four weeks followed by sub-culturing into germination medium supplemented with 5 µM 2iP, 0.1 µM 2,4-D and 5 µM BAP and finally to germination medium with 0.35 µM GA 3e0
Outcome
shoot regeneratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“highest percentage of shoot regeneration (85%) was achieved by sub-culturing the embryogenic calli directly into the modified Eeuwens Y 3 medium devoid of any growth regulators for four weeks followed by sub-culturing into germination medium supplemented with 5 µM 2iP, 0.1 µM 2,4-D and 5 µM BAP and finally to germination medium with 0.35 µM GA 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1500 · show in text ↑
e1

“ovary-derived calli of coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found a positive effect of 2iP on regeneration of coconut ovary calli.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
2iPe0
Outcome
plant regeneratione0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“positive effect of 2iP and GA 3 on plant regeneration in ovary-derived calli of coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found a positive effect of GA 3 on regeneration of coconut ovary calli.

Taxon
coconute0
Treatment
GA 3e0
Outcome
plant regeneratione0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“positive effect of 2iP and GA 3 on plant regeneration in ovary-derived calli of coconut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1624 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

class · growth · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

in vitro · growth · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

processing · growth · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.