Paper · 2007 · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

Responses of Two Contrasting Genotypes of Rice to Brown Planthopper

Yuanyuan Wang; Xiaolan Wang; Hongyu Yuan; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
72
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and brown planthoppers (BPH) (Nilaparvata lugens Stål) provide an ideal system for studying molecular mechanisms involved in the interactions between plants and phloem-feeding insects. The phenotypic responses and changes in transcript profiles of seedlings representing two rice cultivars differing in resistance to the BPH were analyzed. In the BPH-compatible (susceptible) cv. MH63, BPH feeding reduced three examined plant growth parameters (leaf area expansion, height increases, and dry weight increases) and photosynthetic rates of the leaves. In the BPH-incompatible (resistant) cv. B5, BPH feeding caused slight reductions in protein and sucrose contents, but the plants maintained their photosynthetic activity and grew normally. A cDNA microarray containing 1,920 suppression subtractive hybridization clones was used to explore the transcript profiles differences in the two cultivars under control and BPH-feeding conditions. In total, 160 unique genes were detected as being significantly affected by BPH feeding in rice plants, covering a wide range of functional categories, and there were 38 genes that showed the similar transcript pattern in both genotypes. The physiological responses and transcript profiles of plants represented in both genotypes suggested that multiple pathways might be involved in reprogramming of BPH-infested rice plants. The differences in transcript levels between the compatible and incompatible interactions revealed in this study were not only the reaction of resistance and susceptibility but also reflections of different damage rates and genotypic backgrounds of the rice cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planthopper feeding reduced leaf expansion, height increase and dry weight increase in susceptible MH63.

Material
cv. MH63e0
Treatment
BPH feedinge0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
leaf area expansion, height increases, and dry weight increasese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the BPH-compatible (susceptible) cv. MH63, BPH feeding reduced three examined plant growth parameters (leaf area expansion, height increases, and dry weight increases)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planthopper feeding reduced photosynthetic rate in susceptible MH63.

Material
cv. MH63e0
Treatment
BPH feedinge0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
photosynthetic rates of the leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the BPH-compatible (susceptible) cv. MH63, BPH feeding reduced three examined plant growth parameters (leaf area expansion, height increases, and dry weight increases) and photosynthetic rates of the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planthopper feeding slightly reduced protein and sucrose contents in resistant B5.

Material
cv. B5e0
Treatment
BPH feedinge0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
protein and sucrose contentse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the BPH-incompatible (resistant) cv. B5, BPH feeding caused slight reductions in protein and sucrose contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant B5 maintained photosynthetic activity under planthopper feeding.

Material
cv. B5e0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
maintained their photosynthetic activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the BPH-incompatible (resistant) cv. B5, BPH feeding caused slight reductions in protein and sucrose contents, but the plants maintained their photosynthetic activity and grew normally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant B5 grew normally under planthopper feeding.

Material
cv. B5e0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
grew normallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the BPH-incompatible (resistant) cv. B5, BPH feeding caused slight reductions in protein and sucrose contents, but the plants maintained their photosynthetic activity and grew normally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planthopper feeding significantly affected 160 unique rice genes.

Taxon
rice plantsOryza sativae0
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
unique genese0
Value
160e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“160 unique genes were detected as being significantly affected by BPH feeding in rice plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-eight genes had similar transcript patterns in both genotypes.

Outcome
similar transcript patterne0
Value
38 genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“38 genes that showed the similar transcript pattern in both genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–46 · show in text ↑

infection · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

33 papers: 11 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

infection · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

infection · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.