Paper · 1997 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of common root rot ( Cochliobolus sativus ) on yields of barley under experimental conditions in northern Syria

J. A. G. van Leur; M. Z. Alamdar; S. Khawatmi

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The impact of Cochliobolus sativus on grain yield of different barley cultivars was studied for 3 seasons in northern Syria by comparing plots with and without artificial inoculation. Distributing oat kernels infested with C. sativus next to barley seed and inoculating seed with C. sativus conidia in a peat carrier resulted in an increase in common root rot symptoms on the subcrown internode. Subcrown internodes were shorter in inoculated than uninoculated plots. The effect of inoculation differed greatly among cultivars and years. Highest losses from the common root rot occurred under dry growing conditions, whereas a significant yield increase was noted on 2 susceptible lines grown under adequate moisture. As common root rot can reduce barley yield in unfavourable environments, the disease should be considered by crop improvement programs aimed at low-rainfall zones in Mediterranean environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Cochliobolus sativus increased common root rot symptoms on the subcrown internode of barley.

Treatment
Distributing oat kernels infested with C. sativus next to barley seed and inoculating seed with C. sativus conidia in a peat carriere2
Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianae1pathogen
Outcome
common root rot symptoms on the subcrown internodee2
Direction
increasee2
Comparator
without artificial inoculatione1
Setting
northern Syriat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The impact of Cochliobolus sativus on grain yield of different barley cultivars was studied for 3 seasons in northern Syria by comparing plots with and without artificial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e2

“Distributing oat kernels infested with C. sativus next to barley seed and inoculating seed with C. sativus conidia in a peat carrier resulted in an increase in common root rot symptoms on the subcrown internode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–394 · show in text ↑
t0

“under experimental conditions in northern Syria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subcrown internodes were shorter in inoculated than in uninoculated barley plots.

Treatment
artificial inoculatione1
Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianae1pathogen
Outcome
Subcrown internodese3
Direction
shortere3
Comparator
uninoculated plotse3
Setting
northern Syriat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The impact of Cochliobolus sativus on grain yield of different barley cultivars was studied for 3 seasons in northern Syria by comparing plots with and without artificial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e3

“Subcrown internodes were shorter in inoculated than uninoculated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“under experimental conditions in northern Syria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of inoculation differed greatly among barley cultivars and years.

Material
different barley cultivarse1
Outcome
effect of inoculatione4
Qualifier
differed greatly among cultivars and yearse4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The impact of Cochliobolus sativus on grain yield of different barley cultivars was studied for 3 seasons in northern Syria by comparing plots with and without artificial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effect of inoculation differed greatly among cultivars and years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–536 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest losses from common root rot occurred under dry growing conditions in barley.

Outcome
losses from the common root rote5
Direction
Higheste5
Setting
dry growing conditionse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The impact of Cochliobolus sativus on grain yield of different barley cultivars was studied for 3 seasons in northern Syria by comparing plots with and without artificial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e5

“Highest losses from the common root rot occurred under dry growing conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–615 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two susceptible barley lines showed a significant yield increase under adequate moisture.

Material
2 susceptible linese6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
increasee6
Setting
adequate moisturee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The impact of Cochliobolus sativus on grain yield of different barley cultivars was studied for 3 seasons in northern Syria by comparing plots with and without artificial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e6

“a significant yield increase was noted on 2 susceptible lines grown under adequate moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–716 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Common root rot should be considered by crop improvement programs aimed at low-rainfall zones in Mediterranean environments.

Outcome
the disease should be considered by crop improvement programse7
Setting
low-rainfall zonese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The impact of Cochliobolus sativus on grain yield of different barley cultivars was studied for 3 seasons in northern Syria by comparing plots with and without artificial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
e7

“the disease should be considered by crop improvement programs aimed at low-rainfall zones in Mediterranean environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–910 · show in text ↑

Bipolaris sorokiniana · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

growing medium · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · Bipolaris sorokiniana · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

infection · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 24 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.