Paper · 1984 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

REACTION OF SPRING BARLEYS TO COMMON ROOT ROT AND ITS EFFECT ON YIELD COMPONENTS

W. E. GREY; D. E. MATHRE

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980. At Bozeman, autoclaved oat kernels colonized by Cochliobolus sativus added with seed, effected a mean disease rating (DR) among the cultivars of 42.8, compared to 30.3, when autoclaved uncolonized oat kernels were added. In spite of the mean increase in disease severity of the inoculated plots, there was no significant difference in yield between inoculated and noninoculated plots. Later developed yield components, i.e. kernels per spike and kernel weight, compensated for the initial reduction in fertile tillers caused by CRR. Therefore, in population of plants under disease pressure from CRR, compensating effects on yield components may allow for little or no overall yield reduction, particularly in cultivars that are not highly susceptible to CRR. The two-row, Hannchen-type cultivars were all intermediate in DR at both locations. The two-row, Smyrna-type cultivars were high in susceptibility at Glasgow but intermediate in reaction to CRR at Bozeman. The six-row, Manchuria-Coast groups of cultivars were more diverse in their reaction to CRR at both locations. It appears that genetic relationships have more influence on a cultivar’s disease rating to CRR than has grouping based upon physiological characteristics.Key words: Barley groups, Cochliobolus sativus, yield components

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Cochliobolus sativus colonized kernels increased barley disease rating to 42.8 compared with 30.3 for uncolonized kernels at Bozeman.

Treatment
autoclaved oat kernels colonized by Cochliobolus sativus added with seede1
Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianae1pathogen
Outcome
disease ratinge1
Direction
increasee2
Value
42.8e1
Qualifier
compared to 30.3e1
Comparator
autoclaved uncolonized oat kernelse1
Setting
Bozemane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Bozeman, autoclaved oat kernels colonized by Cochliobolus sativus added with seed, effected a mean disease rating (DR) among the cultivars of 42.8, compared to 30.3, when autoclaved uncolonized oat kernels were added.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–484 · show in text ↑
e2

“In spite of the mean increase in disease severity of the inoculated plots, there was no significant difference in yield between inoculated and noninoculated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with Cochliobolus sativus did not significantly change barley yield compared with noninoculated plots.

Treatment
inoculated plotse2
Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianae0pathogen
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
no significant differencee2
Comparator
noninoculated plotse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e2

“In spite of the mean increase in disease severity of the inoculated plots, there was no significant difference in yield between inoculated and noninoculated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–648 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later developed kernels per spike and kernel weight compensated for the initial reduction in fertile tillers caused by common root rot.

Interactor
Cochliobolus sativusBipolaris sorokinianae0pathogen
Outcome
kernels per spike and kernel weighte3
Direction
compensatede3
Qualifier
Later developed yield componentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bipolaris sorokiniana
Bipolaris sorokiniana · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e3

“Later developed yield components, i.e. kernels per spike and kernel weight, compensated for the initial reduction in fertile tillers caused by CRR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–796 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two-row Hannchen-type barley cultivars were intermediate in disease rating at both locations.

Material
two-row, Hannchen-type cultivarse4
Outcome
DRe4
Direction
intermediatee4
Setting
both locationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e4

“The two-row, Hannchen-type cultivars were all intermediate in DR at both locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two-row Smyrna-type barley cultivars were highly susceptible at Glasgow.

Material
two-row, Smyrna-type cultivarse5
Outcome
susceptibilitye5
Direction
highe5
Setting
Glasgowe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e5

“The two-row, Smyrna-type cultivars were high in susceptibility at Glasgow but intermediate in reaction to CRR at Bozeman.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two-row Smyrna-type barley cultivars were intermediate in reaction to common root rot at Bozeman.

Material
two-row, Smyrna-type cultivarse5
Outcome
reaction to CRRe5
Direction
intermediatee5
Setting
Bozemane5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e5

“The two-row, Smyrna-type cultivars were high in susceptibility at Glasgow but intermediate in reaction to CRR at Bozeman.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The six-row Manchuria-Coast barley groups were more diverse in reaction to common root rot at both locations.

Material
six-row, Manchuria-Coast groups of cultivarse6
Outcome
reaction to CRRe6
Direction
more diversee6
Setting
both locationse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e6

“The six-row, Manchuria-Coast groups of cultivars were more diverse in their reaction to CRR at both locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1340 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic relationships appear to influence barley disease rating to common root rot more than grouping by physiological characteristics.

Outcome
cultivar’s disease rating to CRRe7
Direction
more influencee7
Comparator
grouping based upon physiological characteristicse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of common root rot (CRR), caused primarily by Cochliobolus sativus, on yield components in 16 barley cultivars representative of three groups—two-row (Hannchen and Smyrna types), Coast, and Manchuria—were studied at Bozeman and Glasgow, Mont, in 1980.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–263 · show in text ↑
e7

“It appears that genetic relationships have more influence on a cultivar’s disease rating to CRR than has grouping based upon physiological characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1496 · show in text ↑

Bipolaris sorokiniana · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Bipolaris sorokiniana · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.