Abstract
SUMMARY In a semi‐commercial field trial, the soaking of barley seeds infected with Ustilago nuda in a 0⋅2 per cent suspension of thiram for 24 hours at 30°C reduced the number of infected plants from 244 (0⋅95 per cent) to 2⋅25 (0⋅009 per cent) per plot. Hot‐water treatment (2 hr at 42⋅7°) was less effective. In a second, smaller, trial soaks in thiram and “Vitavax” gave 100 per cent control and seed treatment with a 10 per cent “Vitavax” dust reduced infection from 3⋅44 per cent to 0⋅14 per cent.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
A thiram soak reduced infected barley plants from 244 to 2⋅25 per plot.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- soaking of barley seeds infected with Ustilago nuda in a 0⋅2 per cent suspension of thiram for 24 hours at 30°Ce0
- Interactor
- Ustilago nuda
Ustilago nudae0pathogen - Outcome
- number of infected plantse0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 2⋅25 (0⋅009 per cent) per plote0
- Comparator
- 244 (0⋅95 per cent)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“soaking of barley seeds infected with Ustilago nuda in a 0⋅2 per cent suspension of thiram for 24 hours at 30°C reduced the number of infected plants from 244 (0⋅95 per cent) to 2⋅25 (0⋅009 per cent) per plot”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot-water treatment was less effective than the thiram soak.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- Hot‐water treatment (2 hr at 42⋅7°)e0
- Outcome
- less effectivee0
- Direction
- less effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Hot‐water treatment (2 hr at 42⋅7°) was less effective”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
A thiram soak gave complete control in the second trial.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- thirame0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Value
- 100 per cente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soaks in thiram and “Vitavax” gave 100 per cent control”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
A Vitavax soak gave complete control in the second trial.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- “Vitavax”e0
- Outcome
- controle0
- Value
- 100 per cente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“soaks in thiram and “Vitavax” gave 100 per cent control”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Ten percent Vitavax dust reduced infection from 3⋅44 to 0⋅14 per cent.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- 10 per cent “Vitavax” duste0
- Outcome
- infectione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 0⋅14 per cente0
- Comparator
- 3⋅44 per cente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed treatment with a 10 per cent “Vitavax” dust reduced infection from 3⋅44 per cent to 0⋅14 per cent”
t0“Barley”
The same questions in other papers
thiram · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
thiram · control · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
infection · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →application · disease · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.