Paper · 2011 · Agricultural and Food Science

The effect of different tillage-fertilization practices on the mycoflora of wheat grains

S. SUPRONIENE; A. MANKEVICIENE; G. KADZIENE

11
claims
15
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A two-factor field experiment was carried out at the Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture during the period 2005-2008. The influence of different tillage and fertilization practices on wheat grain fungal contamination was evaluated. Grain surface contamination and internal grain infection with fungi were quantified using agar tests. Purified colonies were identified using different manuals. A total of 16 fungal genera were identified in spring and winter wheat grains. Alternaria infected 46.3% - 99.9%, Cladosporium 26.9% - 77.8%, Fusarium 0.9% - 37.1%, Penicillium 1.3% - 2.5% of grains tested. Winter wheat grain surface contamination by fungi ranged from 7.2 × 103 to 24.8 × 103 of colony forming units per g of grain (cfu g-1), spring wheat from 14.8 × 103 to 80.3 × 103 cfu g-1. No-tillage increased winter wheat grain infection by Alternaria, Aspergillus and Cladosporium species and total count of cfu g-1 on spring wheat grain surface. High fertilizer rates resulted in an increase in spring wheat grain infection by Fusarium and Penicillium species and total count of cfu g-1 on both spring and winter wheat grain surface.;

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixteen fungal genera were identified in spring and winter wheat grain.

Organ / stage
grainse0
Outcome
fungal generae0
Value
16 fungal generae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 16 fungal genera were identified in spring and winter wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–470 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria infected 46.3%–99.9% of tested wheat grains.

Interactor
AlternariaAlternariae0pathogen
Outcome
Alternaria infectede0
Value
46.3% - 99.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternaria infected 46.3% - 99.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cladosporium infected 26.9%–77.8% of tested wheat grains.

Interactor
CladosporiumCladosporiume0pathogen
Outcome
Cladosporiume0
Value
26.9% - 77.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cladosporium
Cladosporium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAjay Kumar Chaurasiya · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cladosporium 26.9% - 77.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium infected 0.9%–37.1% of tested wheat grains.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusariume0
Value
0.9% - 37.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium 0.9% - 37.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–556 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penicillium infected 1.3%–2.5% of tested wheat grains.

Interactor
PenicilliumPenicilliume0pathogen
Outcome
Penicilliume0
Value
1.3% - 2.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Penicillium
Penicillium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMilo Manica · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Penicillium 1.3% - 2.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grain-surface fungal contamination ranged from 7.2 × 103 to 24.8 × 103 cfu per gram.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain surface contamination by fungie0
Value
7.2 × 103 to 24.8 × 103 of colony forming units per g of grain (cfu g-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat grain surface contamination by fungi ranged from 7.2 × 103 to 24.8 × 103 of colony forming units per g of grain (cfu g-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–734 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring wheat grain-surface fungal contamination ranged from 14.8 × 103 to 80.3 × 103 cfu per gram.

Outcome
spring wheate0
Value
14.8 × 103 to 80.3 × 103 cfu g-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring wheat from 14.8 × 103 to 80.3 × 103 cfu g-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased winter wheat grain infection by Alternaria, Aspergillus and Cladosporium.

Treatment
No-tillagee0
Outcome
grain infection by Alternaria, Aspergillus and Cladosporium speciese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No-tillage increased winter wheat grain infection by Alternaria, Aspergillus and Cladosporium species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased spring wheat grain-surface fungal colony counts.

Treatment
No-tillagee0
Outcome
total count of cfu g-1 on spring wheat grain surfacee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No-tillage increased winter wheat grain infection by Alternaria, Aspergillus and Cladosporium species and total count of cfu g-1 on spring wheat grain surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer rates increased spring wheat grain infection by Fusarium and Penicillium.

Treatment
High fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
spring wheat grain infection by Fusarium and Penicillium speciese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High fertilizer rates resulted in an increase in spring wheat grain infection by Fusarium and Penicillium species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertilizer rates increased grain-surface fungal colony counts in spring and winter wheat.

Treatment
High fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
total count of cfu g-1 on both spring and winter wheat grain surfacee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High fertilizer rates resulted in an increase in spring wheat grain infection by Fusarium and Penicillium species and total count of cfu g-1 on both spring and winter wheat grain surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1134 · show in text ↑

tillage · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 19 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

tillage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 51 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 98 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.